They would rather we not attract people who are long term thinkers, perceiving the horizon as their goal instead of the upcoming ‘game’ or the next ‘election.’
By Frank Roman
Last week I spoke to you about the importance of your role as a valuable campaigner and the responsibility that we, as members of European Americans United, have taken upon ourselves to secure the posterity of our people. I also addressed what many of us – EAU member and non-member alike — knows to be true, that our systemic enemies in the government and the media who have hijacked the nation of our forefathers and their posterity do indeed fear what we have to say. They fear that if ideas like true diversity – wherein racial differences are actually acknowledged and transacted to everyone’s benefit – undeniably gains traction, their grip on our people’s collective individuality will be terminally weakened. Additionally, they don’t want to hear organizations like EAU say that ‘hate’ is NOT an indispensable resource to use in pursuit of constitutionally ordained longevity because that might cause a few people to rethink what the true hate mongers say about white advocacy.
They fear the day that European Americans will come to realize how few the distinctions are between communism and predatory capitalism with all of their attendant multiculturalism, financial enslavement, bottomless bureaucracy and globalist ambitions. They would rather we not attract people who are long term thinkers, perceiving the horizon as their goal instead of the upcoming ‘game’ or the next ‘election.’ In whatever capacity justice serves to keep them in check our enemies cannot afford to let go of the awakening badger they are latched onto. I want to stress that your activism – our activism – should hinge on the fact that our enemies are NOT the omniscient undefeatable Gorgon they think they are for corruption is their mother’s milk and corruption must ultimately sicken and kill its host. Indeed folks, there IS plenty to do. The EAU Board of Directors is standing by to offer assistance and guidance.
You know, it’s bad enough that our nation — founded by Europeans for people of European extraction — is being swarmed by a tidal wave of illegal immigration from the very primitive Third World in the southern hemisphere. But it’s far, far worse when unaccountable judges who are ordained for life and therefore answer to practically no one stand directly in the way of our nation’s sovereignty which, in truth, is the very posterity of our people. Hence we can safely conclude they do this not out of concern for the constitutionality of legislation, but because of their own individual views, prejudice, and inclinations. Of course, immigration is just one example we can site which clearly demonstrates the vile depth of corruption in our system. More on that in a minute.
On October 10th 2007, U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle independently blocked the construction of a new border fence using a phony excuse tagged as “unknown environmental impacts” which demonstrates the most recent case of dishonest advocacy. Apparently, a 1.5-mile section of a border fence in a wildlife conservation area on the Arizona-Mexico line was simply too much to bear so she put a temporary hold on it. She said there was not enough time to determine what kind of harm would come to the natural environment and that the government, which is feebly trying to heed the call of many concerned citizens, was trying to force the ecological study through and start building a border fence “before anyone would wake up.” Judge Huvelle also inquired why a matching ecological concern was not applied to building border fences in Texas and California. Although President Bush finally read the handwriting on the wall and signed a law last year ordering Homeland Security to build 700 miles of fence along the U.S.-Mexico border, a barrier that should have gone up the day after 911, the proposed fence is running into strong hostility in Texas thanks in large part to environmental groups who are more concerned with the preservation of political correctness than Caucasoids. Now, the area in question is the San Pedro conservation area which includes one of the last free-flowing rivers in the Southwest, the San Pedro River. The river banks are spread with cottonwood and willow trees; is a seasonal flyway for millions of nomadic birds and hosts a large diversity of plant and animal life. Well, it seems to me the good Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle would have realized that millions of desperate Third World invaders with their garbage and human waste are a terrible threat to that unspoiled area’s integrity and would have never questioned the need for a fence. To his limited credit Homeland Security Czar Chertoff overruled the judge and ordered the fence to be built, no thanks to an awakening segment of the American public. This episode should serve as a strong reminder that in a world of continuing dissolution, certain forces are at work to deceive and swindle – until they are caught. Additionally, it would have been a cold day in Hell if Judge Huvelle and Czar Chertoff had said a study should have been forthcoming on the impact of America from the ongoing deluge of the Third World and low white birth rates. No, neither of them is interested in Constitutional legality, a border fence’s requirements, or even the environment. They are and always have been more worried about the condition of the migrants ‘rights,’ their ability to obtain free health care, free WIC, free food stamps, a free education, and sending money out of the country to yet another God forsaken fly-blown village. In the name of political expediency people like them ultimately don’t recognize our borders, our nation’s sovereignty or the truthful concept of realistic diversity.
Earlier I said that immigration is just one example we can site which clearly demonstrates the vile depth of corruption in our justice system. While I am convinced many of you can easily come up with bullet proof examples allow me to point out a new threat. Western Voices World News recently posted a report that the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill called HR 1955, the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007. This bill is one of the most barefaced attacks against the Constitution this activist has ever seen and in point of fact defines thought crimes as homegrown terrorism. If passed into law by the Senate, it will also initiate a star chamber-like panel and a “Center of Excellence” to study and defeat so called thought criminals. Unlike earlier anti-terror legislation, this bill explicitly targets the voter population of the United States and uses vague language to identify homegrown terrorism. After having read the entire bill, I saw little to nothing about the Muslims with whom we are at war. Why? Because this bill is talking about you and me, the tax paying voters and consumers they depend on to soak up every word they say without question. Incredibly enough, 404 of our so-called elected representatives from both the Democrat and Republican parties voted in support of this bill. There is little doubt that this bill is specifically targeting the growing patriot community that is demanding the reinstatement of the Constitution. Offhand this makes me think there are more people than they’d like to contend with who are fed up with the war in Iraq, taxation without representation, and the ongoing deluge of Mexicans who are blithely passing through the holes created by slow border reinforcement.
Now let me tell you what you should really be concerned about. This bill mentions the Internet – the very one you are using now — as a central resource for so-called terrorist communications. It even mentions “broad and constant streams” a term used to describe many of the patriot and pro-constitution Internet radio networks that have been formed. Sound familiar? And really, I don’t even think they can apply this law to Muslim propaganda websites based offshore. HR 1955 goes on to say that homegrown terrorists span all ages and races; which is to say anyone they don’t like is a potential terrorist. Therefore they want to lump everyone together in order to cover their bases. The coup de grace is that Congress thinks it would be a good idea to imitate gulag prone control states like Germany, Austria and the United Kingdom as templates in order to rout domestic terrorists. There is little doubt that while these “findings of Congress” barely mentions the very Muslims who have attacked the West for centuries they obliquely fall right in line with the growing patriot community, the majority of which are European Americans. It’s clear enough to me that what the government fears in it’s war on terror is a resurrection of European American self-awareness because it causes danger to the multicultural house of cards, something those operating as Republicrats fear much more than Islam itself. And if you think about it, HR 1955 goes far beyond simply creating laws in order to preserve law and order; with the RICO Act and the Patriot Act not being enough for them. It transgresses into the dark realm of population control through coercion and fear in order to preserve the government’s vested interests just in case a restive people figures out what’s going on. Of course, we can lay some of the blame at the feet of leftist eco terrorist organizations such as ELF and ALF for alerting the lords of corruption into taking action. And before anyone starts braying about Tim McVeigh, a subject I have long ago become weary of, he was not directed by any group to bomb the Murrah federal building in Oklahoma and acted entirely on his own. No amount of laws in the universe could have stopped his criminal act. And speaking of criminal acts, HR 1955 is so vaguely worded it could also be read to include ordinary criminality. If this bill is passed and signed by Mr. Bush don’t hold your breath waiting for the federal government to go after openly radical mestizo groups like LaRaza or MEChA who have openly proclaimed how badly they want to re-conquer the southwest United States’ without firing a shot.’ You see, these groups receive millions of dollars a year in tax assessments courtesy of Uncle Sam and it is the job of people like Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle to protect them without getting caught. I also don’t believe there would be any surplus prosecutions of radical Muslims under HR1955 living in the United States because for the most part they are playing it smart by keeping their heads down and their mouths shut in order to keep getting minority status goodies, such as earned income tax credits and out of state tuition. And really, outside of 911, as bad as it was, have you seen a rash of Islamic attacks on American soil? I know I haven’t because I have been led to believe Homeland Security, the CIA and the FBI are on the job and has thwarted dozens of Muslim attacks. At least that’s what I keep hearing hear Shaun Hannity and Bill O’Reilly insisting upon. So what are these people preparing for in typical preemptive fashion against the current – but dwindling — majority population of America? Also, when you read the bill in its entirety don’t be fooled by its flaccid promise to protect everyone’s freedom of speech and so forth. The fact that they are going after thought crimes by way of ambiguous language nullifies that silly argument. At best if these commissars get you in their sites and run you through the wringer you will be “drummed out of professional societies, publically humiliated, and relegated to the fringes of intellectual life (K. McDonald ).” The fact that this empire-building, tax stealing, multicultural, runaway federal government views its majority population as objects of pre-emptive legal action belies a moral sickness too vile to comprehend but which must be addressed. Therefore, we as European Americans have a lawful and ethical responsibility to not only weaken it through a relentless barrage of “Critical Theory,” but in due course replace it.
In conclusion I believe HR 1955 is actually a form of hate crimes legislation, which in turn is “thought crime” legislation because it penalizes politically-incorrect beliefs, thoughts, and feelings rather than physical crimes. EAU is revolted by violence – except for self defense — against anyone, but is in dire opposition to “thought crime” legislation. By way of its very ambiguity and the tendency of election mongering politicians to overreach themselves, HR 1955 destabilizes the core of freedom of speech in what we used to call our representative republic, and it finalizes the electoral containment needed to enter into a formal globalist state of rule. Of course when that happens something other than patriotism has to fill the vacuum and you can be sure there are plenty of government sanctioned leftist / Boasian / Ignatiev organizations that have already been hard at work indoctrinating our people for at least fifty years; and, who will continue to do so unless something is done now to oppose them. As a matter of fact should this government continue down the path it is on, we or our immediate descendants will be forced to “disavow our ancient political culture, trash the institutions of government, outlaw religion and (they will) launch a revolution founded upon a philosophy of equality through the mass murder of class enemies and redistribution of wealth. (M. O’Meara).” That, my friend, is where you and European Americans United come in. In 1943 the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, a case that is the law of the land, should contrast how out of touch the power mongers actually are in terms of what it means to be an American. Justice Robert H. Jackson, writing for the Court, declared, “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.”