Should White Americans Organize?

White intellectuals who favor abstract people of no particular race over the people of their own racial hearth fire are no match for liberals and the colored barbarians. Their universalism is not a moral evolution, it is a descent to a state of effortless virtue, diametrically opposed to the struggles and accomplishments of our European ancestors. Fortunately, this kind of vapid thinking is becoming more threadbare by the day. BUT–the time to organize and act is fast running out.

Organizations that are based on race and/or ethnicity abound in the United States.

Most familiar is the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).

La Raza (The Race) purports to represent the interests of Hispanics.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is an Islamic advocacy group that supports the interests of Muslims, most are ethnic Middle Easterners.

There are also numerous race-based and ethnicity-based affinity groups. There are black affinity groups for most any occupation you can imagine. For example there is a black lawyers’ organization (NCBL), a black police union (NBPA), and a black teachers’ association (NABSE).

Affinity associations may lobby for legislation that favors the people group they represent and file lawsuits when deemed necessary. Some provide advice for members, and a few even offer affinity-group discounts at participating businesses.

Missing from the list of race and ethnic affinity groups are associations for white people. Such groups would be considered racist.

Imagine, for example, a National Association for the Advancement of White People (NAAWP) or a white advocacy group called The Race that purports to represent the interests of people of European descent. The Council of American-Caucasian Relations would most likely be condemned by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a hate group.

Also condemned would be a white lawyers’ organization, a white police union, and a white teachers’ association.

Nonetheless, there are affinity groups that represent white interests.

• One of those groups is the Advanced White Society.

AWS was founded and led by Jason Hiecke. The group’s headquarters are in New Jersey and it is organized regionally. It advocates various white causes. Its signature issues appears to be the creation of an all-white homeland.

The groups says it is “a group of hardworking dedicated white people who care about the future of our race, countries and what will be left to our children.”

Its self-stated purpose is to “spread truth that the media hides.”

While white people are frequently stigmatized as bigoted racists, they are simultaneously attacked with impunity by anti-white racists.

In 2014, for example, the movie Dear White People was distributed. The apparent purpose of the movie was to further stigmatize white Americans as insensitive. The movie bombed at the box office, grossing less the $4.5-million.

The same year Selma fared better at the box office, due in part by a starring role by Oprah Winfrey. The movie reinforced the white stereotype as bigoted and self-serving.

In reality, white-dominated Western culture has enhanced the lives of all humanity. Ironically, Winfrey’s billions would have been impossible were white Americans truly racists.

• So why the disparity?

White people world-wide are falsely stigmatized as oppressors of non-whites. The false villain-victim world view is classic Marxism. White people are portrayed as the oppressing bourgeois while non-whites are casts as the oppressed proletariat.

Oddly, the oppressed non-white masses yearn to invade white spaces where they may “breathe free.”

The apparent objective of cultural Marxism is to eliminate the economic disparity between Western civilization and Third World countries through a process of white genocide. Once Western culture is displaced, humanity will enjoy social justice and equality they say. Granted, there will be no Third World nations; only Third-World lifestyles, or worse.

Currently Western innovation provides the economic infrastructure for all humanity. When that infrastructure is removed, the economies of the world will necessarily diminish. A new dark ages will emerge as world civilization implodes into a paleolithic existence.

Oddly, those who advocate the demise of humanity’s living standards arrogantly refer to themselves as “progressives.”

• The Marxist strategy is not new.

We observed cultural Marxism destroy the middle class (bourgeois) in the Soviet Union as an estimated 20-million were killed [source].

During China’s cultural revolution, the bourgeois was identified as the nation’s intellectuals. The bourgeois suffered a loss of an estimated 1.5 million in that movement that began in 1966 [source].

As the white bourgeois is currently stigmatized as oppressors in America, the bourgeois in the Soviet Union and China was also stigmatized.

Ironically, the oppressed proletariat in both the Soviet Union and China suffered severely as the most productive people groups suffered genocide. Similarly, the oppressed black proletariat in South Africa is suffering under the auspices of “power to the people” which is, in reality, power reserved for the Marxist elites.

Some may ask, Why didn’t the bourgeois in Stalin’s Soviet Union and Mao Zedong’s cultural revolution didn’t resist their own demise?

That question can be answered by asking, “Why do white Americans not resist their own demise today?”

2015-03-17