Canada: Political Parties Being Used to Destroy Democracy

by Jeff Goodall

“…there is no way that a White person can be politically ‘mainstream’ without contributing to their own marginalisation and demise.”

I recently read an article in the Toronto Sun indicating that Canadian confidence in our democratic system is deteriorating quite rapidly. We are, according to the heading, “less satisfied” than we were just a few years ago.

According to Samara polls conducted in 2004 and 2012, the primary reason is that voters feel “fed up with MPs who toe the party line at the expense of their constituents’ needs and wishes.”

And, interestingly, of 65 MPs polled by Samara, most said that they “went to Parliament with their constituents in mind, but found their hands tied by party demands.”

In summation, Samara rhetorically asked “What does it suggest about Canadian political parties if both MPs and citizens see those parties as being at odds with MPs’ abilities to represent their constituents?”

This brings to mind concerns I have held for years to the effect that Canada’s three main political parties now appear to be completely phony, demanding obedience to pre-determined positions without any regard for ideological conviction.

For example, if you are a conservatively-minded individual who wants to support ecological issues, there is no meaningful place for you in the Conservatives. That would interfere with the manufacturing and extractive industries, and infuriate Stephen Harper’s new Chinese “friends”, the surprising acquisition of whom is another issue with me.

This may be why we have a “Green Party” and why it almost gained a second seat recently. And if you wish to be a Conservative you must also toe the line on globalisation, although I detest it as one of the two most destructive factors in our economic decline, even exceeding chronic deficit spending.

If you are a socialist and support the New Democratic Party (NDP), you must support unlimited third-world immigration into Canada, although the presence of a vast pool of cheap labour depresses wages and job security, and is clearly against the best interests of the working class.

Then again, the NDP is totally opposed to globalization, but I can’t support them because they are socialist and I cannot abide socialism. In fact, I left England in 1966 as a self-styled “refugee from socialism”. Been there, done that.
Another thing I agree with the NDP on is the need for unions, although beyond that we are totally at loggerheads as to how this should be done. There are two types of unionism as I see it; the dominant one by far is “social unionism”, which identifies those who believe that union members are responsible for the well-being of all workers everywhere. Such unionists spend substantial amounts of dues money in support of “social justice” both locally and throughout the world.

My own preferred brand is called “business unionism”, and refers to the practice of a union spending its dues revenue exclusively on its own members by looking after bargaining, and carrying out workplace representation through enforcing the collective agreement. This is sometimes called “slot-machine” unionism; your dues go in at the top, and your collective agreement comes out at the bottom.

I am not addressing the Liberal party here, as to my mind they are neither fish nor fowl, and wander through parliament occasionally getting things right but mostly getting them wrong. They are, however, more than equal to the NDP when it comes to enforcing “politically-correct” programmes and attitudes, and more than carry their weight at being a threat to our survival for that reason alone.

Looking at the broader perspective, our racial homogeniety is being relentlessly undermined and destroyed by third-world immigration, the middle-class is being destroyed by the outsourcing of good manufacturing jobs to the third world, and the dispossession of White Canada is ongoing through rigidly-enforced anti-White “affirmative action” and other programmes in both jobs and housing.

And no matter which party you vote for, you will be supporting at least two of these ingredients. The prominence attached to each one of them by each party can vary substantially, but there is no way that a White person can be politically “mainstream” without contributing to their own marginalisation and demise.

There are reasons for that, but I wish to address them in an article devoted to that subject alone. What we see with our political parties is simply part of the mechanics by which we and our civilization are being deliberately destroyed.

For example, the leaders of all parties now struggle to use tax revenues from overwhelmingly White producers to buy votes and curry favour with ethnic “voting blocs”, much to our short- and long-term disadvantage. The money very often doesn’t even stay in Canada, witness Stephen Harper’s recent trip to the Phillipines.

Democracy itself is rapidly becoming a tool for our destruction, with unwanted immigrants voting in terms of racial self-interest rather than anything resembling political principles. The recent disastrous U.S. election indicates that things could be far more advanced than even a racially-aware observer like myself might think.

As the mainstream political parties are now effectively our enemies, it is necessary for us to find strong, fearless leaders who are prepared to go to the wall for their people and for their principles. People who can take the abuse and infamy which will assuredly be heaped upon them by an infuriated enemy, who will not hesitate to use every possible insult and epithet to try to discourage them.

And I am looking for such leaders to emerge from the intelligentsia of the White business and academic worlds, not from the multitude of groups and organizations to be found among the so-called “White Supremacists”.

I want to see a capable and respected person, already holding higher political office, break away from the intolerable strictures of party discipline, and branch out on their own. I believe that the people are ready for this, but if it doesn’t happen very soon, recovery through democratic means may no longer be possible.

I pray it’s not too late.

Jeff Goodall.

See the Toronto Sun article which prompted the above post here.

2012-12-07