Black ethnocentrism / anti-white insolence rises like bile from the belly of the beast, Washington DC.
Attorney General Eric Holder recently told a group of black clergymen that the right to vote was being threatened by people who are seeking to block access to the ballot box by blacks and other minorities.
This is truly world-class chutzpah, by an Attorney General who stopped attorneys in his own Department of Justice from completing the prosecution of black thugs who stationed themselves outside a Philadelphia voting site to harass and intimidate white voters.
This may have seemed like a small episode to some at the time,but it was only the proverbial tip of the iceberg. The U.S.Attorney who was prosecuting that case — J. Christian Adams –resigned from the Department of Justice in protest, and wrote abook about a whole array of similar race-based decisions on votingrights by Eric Holder and his subordinates at the Department ofJustice.
The book is titled Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda ofthe Obama Justice Department. It names names, dates andplaces around the country where the Department of Justice stoppedits own attorneys from pursuing cases of voter fraud andintimidation, when it was blacks who were accused of thesecrimes.
If Mr. Adams is lying, he has taken a huge risk in citingindividuals by name and quoting them directly. Yet, despite thefact that most of those he accuses are lawyers, apparently no onehas sued him. Moreover, Adams has also testified under oath beforethe U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, on the racial double standardat the Department of Justice, when it comes to voting rights.WhatAttorney General Holder has been complaining loudly about, andlaunching federal lawsuits about, are states that require photoidentification to vote. Holder calls this blocking minority”access” to the voting booths.
Since millions of black Americans — like millions of whiteAmericans — are confronted with demands for photo identificationat airports, banks and innumerable other institutions, it is alittle much to claim that requiring the same thing to vote isdenying the right to vote. But Holder’s chutzpah is up to thetask.
Attorney General Holder claims that the states’ requirement ofphoto identification for voting, in order to prevent voter fraud,is just a pretext for discriminating against blacks and otherminorities. He apparently sees no voter fraud, hears no voter fraudand speaks no voter fraud.
Despite Holder’s claim, a little experiment in his own homevoting district showed how easy it is to commit voter fraud. Anactor — a white actor, at that — went to a voting place whereEric Holder is registered to vote, and told them that he was EricHolder.
The actor had no identification at all with him, either with orwithout a photo. He told the voting official that he had forgottenand left his identification in his car. Instead of telling him togo back to the car and get some identification, the official saidthat that was all right, and offered him the ballot.
The actor had the good sense not to actually take the ballot,which would have made him guilty of voter fraud — and, beingwhite, he would undoubtedly have been prosecuted by Eric Holder’sDepartment of Justice.
But the actor had made his point. When a white man with noidentification can go to a voting site, impersonate a black man wholives in that district, and get his ballot offered to him, then itis far too easy to commit voter fraud.
Does not Attorney General Eric Holder understand that? Of coursehe understands it! The man is not stupid, despite his otherfailings.
Holder’s pooh-poohing of voter fraud dangers, and hyping the”threat” of denying minorities “access” to the voting booth, arecompletely consistent with his drive to (1) maximize the number ofvotes by black Democrats and (2) spread as much fear as possibleamong minorities that they are under siege, and that the Democratsare their only protection and salvation.
It is a political protection racket, with payoffs in votes.
Nor can Holder’s boss, Barack Obama, be unaware of voter fraud.After all, he comes from Chicago, where voting officials refuse todiscriminate against dead people.