Minority Rule: The Rise of Political Correctness

<font size=”2″ style=”font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-weight: bold;”>An incomplete documentary by the late White Nationalist producer Byron
Jost (<a href=”http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1451035544403625746″>The Line in the Sand</a>). Featuring <a href=”http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Blog.htm”>Dr. Kevin MacDonald</a>.<br /><br /><br /><a href=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPnCBwpuX9I&feature=PlayList&p=10C15A428C802FB2&playnext_from=PL&index=0&playnext=1″>Play all videos here</a><br /></font>

       
           
           <h1 style=”font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;”><font size=”2″>Diversity Causes Social Withdrawal</font></h1>          
                           <div class=”drdot” style=”font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;”>
<hr style=”height: 2px;” />
</div>
       
         

 <div class=”node” style=”font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;”>
               

       
                <div class=”metanode”><p><font size=”2″>By <span class=”author”>john</span> –
Posted on <span class=”date”>16 January 2010</span></font></p>
       

       
       </div>
           
   <div class=”content”>
     
     
     <p><font size=”2″>Thomas Jefferson warned us that, while the African slaves would need
to be freed, that once emancipation had occurred they would need their
own country separate from ours if we expected to be equally free.</font></p>
<p><font size=”2″>&quot;Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that
these people [blacks are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the
two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature,
habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them.&quot;
–Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821. ME 1:72</font></p>
<p><font size=”2″>Likewise, John Jay understood that homogeneity rather than diversity
was both a blessing and a prerequisite for social cohesion:</font></p>
<p><font size=”2″>&quot;I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to
give this one connected country to one united people–a people descended
from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the
same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very
similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels,
arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody
war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.</font></p>
<p><font size=”2″>This country and this people seem to have been made for each other,
and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an
inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to
each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of
unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties.&quot; — John Jay, Federalist #2</font></p>
<p><font size=”2″>More than 200 years later, along comes Harvard Professor Robert
Putnam and notes: &quot;Rather, inhabitants of diverse communities tend to
withdraw from collective life, to distrust their neighbours regardless
of the colour of their skin, to withdraw even from close friends, to
expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer
less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, to
register to vote less, to agitate for social reform more, but have less
faith that they can make a difference.&quot;(1)</font></p>
<p><font size=”2″>Naturally, being a liberal Harvard Professor and because these facts
contradict both the Professor’s preconceived notions and the conclusions
that diversity advocates demand, Putnam delayed publishing these
findings until he could invent some way to positive spin on them,
stating that releasing the facts without a positive spin would be
&quot;irresponsible.&quot;(2)</font></p>
<p><font size=”2″>His positive spin, based strictly on invalid apples to oranges
comparisons, is that diversity is good in the long run. He bases this
conclusion, naturally, on historical immigration of people who were of
slightly different ethnicities, but of the same anthropological race. He
has absolutely NO positive data to indicate that multiracial diversity
carries ANY long term benefits.</font></p>
<p><font size=”2″>So skip the spin and concentrate on the facts. Diversity doesn’t
build community, it destroys it. It makes people feel isolated and to
withdraw from community life in every way that matters. Thus diverse
communities are WEAK communities.</font></p>
<p><font size=”2″>Of course, we didn’t have to tune in to Professor Putnam to know this
— the evidence is clear every day to anyone who has eyes.</font></p>
<p><font size=”2″>(1) Putnam, Robert (2007) Quoted by Philip Johnston 6/19/2007 in the
Telegraph U.K.<br />
(2) Lloyd, John, Financial Times, October 8, 2006 </font></p>
</div>
   
   
               
       
   
       <div class=”taxonomy”><font size=”2″><span>Tags</span></font> <ul class=”links inline”><li class=”taxonomy_term_8 first last”><font size=”2″><a rel=”tag” href=”http://www.europeanamericansunited.org/home/taxonomy/term/8″>Multiculturalism</a></font></li></ul></div&gt;    
   
 </div>

2010-04-18