He was gaucheenough to have posited that if students and/or professors had legalguns on their persons in 2007 the death toll in the Virginia Techshooting spree could have been much lower.
The assignment for Central Connecticut State University student JohnWalberg and his two classmates was to give an oral presentation on a“relevant issue in the media.” The three chose school violence fortheir topic.
After the oral presentation was over, professor Paula Anderson of Communication 140, promptly filed a complaint with the CCSU Policeagainst student Wahlberg claiming he made students “scared anduncomfortable.” Professor Anderson deemed Wahlberg a “perceived risk”and felt it was her duty to “protect” her class.
What did the young man say in his oral assignment that was sothreatening? Shockingly, Wahlberg had the temerity to discuss concealedcarry laws, guns on campus in the hands of law abiding students, andthe problems with the concept of a “gun free zone.” He was gaucheenough to have posited that if students and/or professors had legalguns on their persons in 2007 the death toll in the Virginia Techshooting spree could have been much lower.
Can you now see why John Wahlberg is a threat to the school?Obviously Wahlberg is the next thing closest to a wild-eyed assassin, adangerous criminal don’t you know? If you don’t see that, then youaren’t alone. But then, we aren’t “professors,” are we?
After professor Anderson filed her complaint, Campus Policeconfronted Whalberg with a list of guns registered in his name anddemanded to know where he kept them.