Violence flares, confusion reigns in response to marriage measures
November 4 was a day of http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=5960 for conservatives across the United States, except in one area: the fight against “gay marriage.”
Successful citizens initiatives in California, Florida (with an astonishing 63%) and Arizona made “gay marriage” unconstitutional in those states, a development that underlines the cognitive dissonance that plagues white liberalism. According to orthodox political correctness, a grand coalition of protected classes share objective interests against white, Christian, males. These protected groups, according to PC dogma, consist of blacks and other nonwhites, homosexuals and women. Yet just as the Democratic nomination process fractured the black/female alliance in an open and bloody conflict of interests, so too November 4 saw homosexuals suffer as a result of the overwhelming black turnout to vote for Barack Obama, who was also the darling of self-hating, pathetic white liberals, among them the bulk of homosexuals. These blacks, along with hispanics, stayed in the polling booths long enough to vote decisively against “gay marriage,” and were a deciding factor in the bans being passed.This was particularly so in California, where blacks and hispanics played a deciding role in the success of Proposition 8, banning “gay marriage.” Blacks came out as new voters in droves to support Obama, swelling their total to 10% of the overall number of voters. And an overwhelming number of these blacks also supported Prop 8. Other elements in this largely fictional politically correct coalition doubtless feel let down. 78% of Jews, for example, key players in the PC united front, supported “gay marriage” in Los Angeles alone. Yet blacks voted 70% in favor of the “marriage” ban, admittedly a drop from their 96% for Obama, but both overwhelming and decisive.
Despite the childish, cultlike worship of Obama as some kind of liberal Messiah, he’s just as much a shrewd machine politician as any other corrupt public figure. For example, he somehow was pitched as some kind of an “antiwar” standard bearer, yet, barely elected, he appointed a radical Zionist, http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=5980, as his right hand man. Emanuel is a supporter of Bush’s Iraq project and a maniacal backer of the most extreme, militaristic Israeli positions.
For homosexuals, Obama stabbed them collectively in the back even before election day. While he made the usual, stock in trade liberal statements about support for “tolerance” and “gay rights,” Obama knew that black America is strongly opposed to any and all aspects of the “gay agenda,” no matter what politically correct theorists tell them they should think. As a result, Obama did not campaign against Prop 8, nor did he even endorse the general idea of “gay marriage.”
The politically correct response to the “gay marriage” defeats has been one of collective confusion, which has boiled into anger and outright violence. Many homosexuals and their supporters blame the democratic process itself, demanding that courts, not voters, decide the question of “gay marriage.” Talking head Keith Olbermann (who is not homosexual) of MSNBC launched into an on air emotional meltdown that swerved into near hysteria and crazed appeals to guilt, while militant protests were sparked nationwide by homosexual groups.
Western Voices World News has long held that calls for “tolerance” often mask strong INtolerance of opposing views, often resulting in witchhunts and irrational behavior of the most primitive kinds. In Palm Springs, a gay outpost in Southern California, one homosexual protest took on the ugly tones of 19th Century religious intolerance. A mob of “gay activists” surrounded and manhandled a lone elderly woman supporter of Prop 8. Shrieking and swearing, with one calling for an end to “nonviolence,” the homosexuals wrenched a Christian cross out of the old woman’s hands, smashed it on the ground, and stomped on it. Then the protesters, now a threatening mob, marched for over a mile on a Latter-day Saints (Mormon) church to express their anger at Mormon support for traditional marriage and family values. The historical treatment of the Mormons in America is a blot on US claims of “tolerance.” In 1844 a similar mob, also certain of its moral rightness, even lynched the Mormon founder, Joseph Smith, and Mormons have repeatedly been exposed to violence and intimidation from intolerant vigilantes, police and officials. In Palm Springs, when a Mormon spokesman attempted to reason with the homosexuals, he was drowned out with jeers and chants by protesters wielding signs with slogans like “Mormons are breeders.” The only things missing were the torches. Amusingly, one of the Palm Springs homosexuals said he was disgusted that “outsiders,” meaning the Mormon hierarchy, had been able to influence the vote. Had he been referring to the millions of illegal aliens in California he would have been guilty of being a “racist,” according to politically correct dogma.
Amusingly, “racism” is also rearing its head in the “gay marriage” controversy, further adding to the cognitive dissonance, desperation and disorientation of the politically correct Kool Aid drinkers who had hoped to have been celebrating a Rainbow Nirvana with the election of the Obamessiah. The confusion is palpable among those shocked that homosexuals were abandoned by their black “allies”: “I wept last night,” wrote Dan Savage, a homosexual columnist best known for attempting to spread the flu to supporters of Christian Right presidential hopeful Gary Bauer by licking doorknobs at one of his campaign offices. “I can’t help but feeling hurt that the love and support aren’t mutual…I’ll eat my shorts if gay and lesbian voters went for McCain at anything approaching the rate that black voters went for Prop 8.”
The “hurt” of homosexuals expressed by Savage became anger in San Francisco, when a black man was harassed at an anti-Prop 8 protest and even called the dreaded “N” word by white homosexuals. That’s a hanging offense even outside the rarefied climes of political correctness. Inside the world of PC it’s a declaration of war.
Savage saw November 4 as a watershed: “I’m done pretending that the handful of racist gay white men out there–and they’re out there, and I think they’re scum–are a bigger problem for African Americans, gay and straight, than the huge numbers of homophobic African Americans are for gay Americans, whatever their color.” That view is heresy for the politically correct, something Savage knows all too well: “This will get my name scratched off the invite list of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, which is famous for its anti-racist-training seminars, but whatever.”
As for blacks, they object to having their history linked to “gay rights.” PC dogmatists love to lump the “civil rights struggle,” with all of the social engineering power such a comparison holds in the media imagination, to the “Johnny Come Lately” cause of the moment, homosexuals. In fact, the whole “homosexual rights” fad is an artificial postmodernist “identity politics” construct designed to undermine the traditional social order. As such, this form of “identity politics” has little organic grounding and is kept going by media overload and serious financial support. In fact, blacks and homosexuals have little in common socially or economically. While homosexual behavior is very widespread in the black community, with the HIV/AIDS rates to prove it, such “down low” behavior is closer to traditional homosexual incidence, which historically was seldom, if ever, an identity or a “lifestyle.” Backing this up is the fact that black women have far higher rates of HIV/AIDS infection than their white counterparts, a function of the fact that black male homosexual behavior is not exclusive, and that such men also have sex with women, thus spreading the disease to them.
In one (in)famous, unintentionally hilarious case, homosexual radicals responded viciously to recognition that the “black/gay alliance” is a myth. The University of Toledo actually fired a black woman, http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=4591, from her position as Associate Vice President of Human Resources, in the name of “civil rights.” Dixon’s crime? She had written a a letter to the editor of the local newspaper objecting to comparisons of “gay rights” with the historical, black “civil rights movement.”
Just as dogmatic PC theology breaks down on black commonality of interests with homosexuals, so too blacks have few interests in common with other nonwhites. This has been seen especially in areas of black/hispanic interface, where open borders have resulted in widespread ethnic cleansing, both nonviolent and otherwise, of whole black areas. Blacks come into competition with hispanics for scarce social resources, from schools to healthcare, welfare and public housing to even jail space. And competition for low skill and no skill work is fierce.
The fact is, the politically correct worldview, which gives special incentives to various protected groups, boils down to a zero sum game, with each group fighting for as much as it is able to wrest from the system, often at the cost of other protected groups which should be, in theory, close allies. Only systems and ideas constructed and kept going by European derived people generate the kind of surplus that allows such a state of affairs to persist. Isolated as they are on college campuses, board rooms or think tank offices, the ideologues who push political correctness usually only talk to one another and seldom have to live with the effects of the chaos they help to generate. The “gay marriage” outcome, and the hysteria now before us, is the result of the slap in the face reality has delivered to the politically correct.
That’s not to say political correctness has been abandoned, though, as Dan Savage acknowledged when he admitted he expects retaliation from the “gay establishment.” There is too much at stake, not least whole careers. And wealthy, powerful http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=5270 like the Anti-Defamation League have committed to it as part of their plan for America.
So it comes as no surprise that, while incidents of homosexual anger against blacks have occurred, the main target of organized “gay rights” activists remains white Christians. Just as the Palm Springs spectacle victimized an elderly white Christian woman and threatened a Mormon church, radical “gay activists” in Lansing, Michigan menaced a church service with baseball bats, threatened parishioners, spread confetti and condoms, acted lewdly and in a vulgar manner, and caused vandalism before being dragged off by police.
Of course, under the present politically correct regime, this will NOT be considered a “hate crime” by gays against Christians, which it certainly is.