European Americans who bury their freedom of speech are committing a ‘grave’ error.
By Frank Roman
It’s been a tough month for the institution of free speech. Although July isn’t quite over Western Voices World News has once again confirmed in no uncertain terms an uptick of assaults against European derived people who have refused to play nice within the acceptable parameters of dialogue when it comes to race. The most important aspect of these phenomena is the fact that, to the very best of my knowledge none of the subjects we’re talking about who have been deemed ‘enemies of the state’ has NOT said anything related to the promotion of criminality or violence. Of course this detail doesn’t matter very much to progressive bed-wetter’s since to them politically incorrect words or beliefs are just as dangerous as actual weapons such as pistols and knives; and because they don’t trust anyone or anything that does not adhere to their supremacy, they are just itching to impose the same legally enforced penalties on speech in the US as their brethren have done in Europe. The last thing they want to see is major indigenous white populations resist becoming a minority through cultural and political suicide, rather than through war, famine or disease; the latter causes being too obvious to ignore (to some extent) in an age of instant communication.
Our enemies understand they can’t keep telling lies about race and nationhood because it stands to reason that those lies will eventually have to be imposed through negative reinforcement such as loss of employment, domestic alienation, public ostracizing (presumably) through the media and finally self doubt. The unity of reaction to the following acts of politically incorrect speech should gives us all the evidence we need to see that these customary accusations are a matter of global policy instead of the personal expressions by “shocked” liberals.
On July 2nd the moneyed bigots over at the ADL’s compound issued a sweeping indictment aimed at radio personality James Edwards and his program called the Political Cesspool and their a brief interview with former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan whose latest book, Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War: has kept the ADL in a state of near hysterics ever since it was released. Now since Mr. Edwards allows “anti-Semites, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, Holocaust deniers, conspiracy theorists and anti-immigrant leaders to voice their views on his show” the ADL’s tattle-tale press release almost reads like a list of criminal charges you would hear a prosecutor convey at the start of a trial. Thankfully however, the first amendment still prevents these sociopaths from calling out the police state goon squads to flush out the “haters.” For now, that is.
On July 10th (TX) Dallas County commissioners were discussing problems with the central collections office that is used to route traffic ticket payments and handle other paperwork normally done by the Courts. Commissioner Kenneth Mayfield, who is a European American, committed the unpardonable sin by saying that central collections “has become a black hole” because paperwork apparently has become lost in the office. Commissioner John Wiley Price, who is black, interrupted him with a shrill “Excuse me!” He then corrected his coworker, saying the office has become a “white hole.” That remark then incited Judge Thomas Jones, who is black of course, to demand an apology from Mayfield for his racially thoughtless parallel. This would almost be funny if it weren’t such a sterling example of the black supremacist / politically correct Kool-Aid drinkers running amok, especially holding seats of power. You know if you think about it, the suddenness of the reaction of the black Dallas County commissioners to Mr. Mayfield’s grade school science analogy should indicate the depth of hatred that is boiling below the surface; giving us all a clue about the kinds of government sanctioned punishment they would like to inflict on “whitey.”
And speaking of government sanctioned punishment: on July 20th Western Voices World News reported on the case of British citizen Stephen Whittle whom US immigration officials detained when he arrived at Los Angeles airport to claim political asylum. And just exactly why was the 41 year old Whittle seeking asylum in the United States from Britain? Simple: he was convicted of writing anti-Jewish articles on a website, but he failed to turn up at Leeds Crown Court for a “hearing.” Those in the know are saying Whittle’s bid for asylum is unlikely to succeed and he could face up to a year in jail in Britain if convicted of being AWOL for his speech crime punishment. Apparently it is very difficult to get political asylum from the UK. You have to establish a well-founded fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality or membership of a particular social group or political opinion. Well, as far as I can tell Mr. Whittle is definitely being persecuted based on his race, which is white, and his opinions which are not politically correct, and his nationality or social group because he’s British. After all hundreds of non-white Muslims, many of whom are illegal residents, can demonstrate in the streets of London holding up signs that threaten bloodshed for their British hosts and they are not compelled to seek asylum anywhere even though they are on television threatening to kill people. If ever you needed a genuine example of what the secular progressive bed-wetter’s such as the ADL, the SPLC, and the likes of black Commissioner John Wiley Price and Judge Thomas Jones want to shackle us with look to Mr. Whittle’s case and others just like it. Are you a Caucasian with opinions and beliefs that superficially offend a protected group; living in a country that practically invented the first amendment via the Magna Carta but long ago scrapped it? Well, its baloney sandwiches and jello for you, whitey.
Also on July 20th Western Voices World News reported the case of a (FLA) New Smyrna Beach police officer, Commander Bill Drossman, who is currently under investigation for forwarding a political e-mail with “possible racial comments” about presidential hopeful Barack Obama. Note the clever phrasing of that last sentence lifted from the article, which implies that Commander Drossman actually formed and then typed the disparaging remarks about Mr. Obama. Actually, the email in question contained comments from Barack Obama’s two books which clearly depicted him, Mr. Obama, as being an anti white black Muslim supremacist. Commander Drossman told the paper he got the e-mail from a friend and passed it on to other officers, but that didn’t stop internal affairs from fastening their claws onto the police officers neck. The video accompanying this story also shows a local black activist acting all outraged and martyred, demanding that Drossman be fired from his position. Never mind the detail that Drossman was merely relaying the email and did not actually write it, let alone the fact it contained Obama’s own words and his explicit dislike for white Americans and his affinity for Muslims. In cases like this the truth is no excuse for spilling the beans; and the beheading of a European American in an all-white police department is now in order.
Returning overseas to government sanctioned punishment again; on July 21st we reported the Immigrant Council of Ireland was to make an official complaint about the publication of what it pompously regarded as a racially offensive article that appeared in the Irish Independent the week before. The self hating nation killers at ICI said they believe the publication of the article, “Africa is giving nothing to anyone – apart from AIDS,” which was written by columnist Kevin Myers and published July 17th violated Section 2 of the government’s thought crime agenda, the Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act of 1989. The fact that Mr. Myers was editorializing about a subject couched in incontrovertible facts means little to nothing to people who see things only one way because if the language is perceived as politically incorrect it is — by default — threatening, violent or abusive and intended to stir up racial “hatred.” You see in the article, Mr. Myers questioned whether it was moral to save an Ethiopian child from starvation, given that it could grow up to face poverty, hunger, violence and possible sexual abuse. He also described Africa as “almost an entire continent of sexually hyperactive indigents, with tens of millions of people who only survive because of help from the outside world.” Now as soon as someone can point out that none of the above is true, that Mr. Myers made this all up to start a riot or cause general upheaval I’d certainly be glad to hear about it. Of course the ICI, which in all probability has more than its share of Marxist progressives and out-and-out white bigots traversing its hallowed halls believes the published article does not just overstep the boundary of common decency but also crosses their “legal boundaries,” said the council’s chief executive, Denise Charlton. In typical bald faced insolence they go on to say “The issue at stake here has nothing to do with freedom of speech or expression.” (You can say that again! –Ed.) They intone it is about respect for, and the upholding of, Ireland’s laws. Journalism, like any other line of work, operates within the framework of the rule of law in Ireland they say. How interesting, though: journalism has to operate “respectfully” not by virtue of the people’s wishes but within the framework of Ireland’s rule of law, or rather the ICI law they most likely pimped non-stop to the legislature until they got it passed. As most Americans — and I’m sure many Irish persons still know — freedom of speech or expression does not require the filing of charges against an author; unless of course said author hurt someone’s feelings and nothing more, a transgression just as bad as say a deadly threat to a government building or individual. Ireland by the way is emulating Britain and its Middle Eastern policy by allowing Muslims to swamp its shores; importing thousands of Africans into the Emerald Isle for the sake of creating a New Ireland, the electorate be damned. What exactly was wrong with the Old Ireland, the Old Britain, or the Old America, for that matter?
Believe me; the farsighted undying hatred of free speech here in America by groups, organizations, bureaucrats and their boosters is very real. While US concocted ‘Hate Crime’ laws come to mind, which are actually precursors to Hate Speech laws, forget the fact courts have often ruled that the First Amendment gives government no power to establish “approved views” of various subgroups of the population –which in the case of hate crime laws and affirmative action does exactly that. The neo Nazi / white supremacist / anti Semitic unholy trilogy will not be allowed to die. The motive to maintain its eternal life has everything to do with media and academic thought control acting at the level of the subconscious before it persuades at the level of the conscious in a manner approved by those who don’t want an honest examination of American history. Why? Because it might reveal that nearly every serious problem that has developed in our society –and to our people– can be traced to a deliberate removal of the sound principles taught by the Founding Fathers (Manufactured Consent) and has been replaced with an ideology that results in one thing and one thing only: “bringing the current society and culture down through unremitting, destructive propaganda (criticism).” You, the listener of these programs, need to help your fellow European Americans recognize that Political Correctness is Marxism, with all that implies: loss of freedom of expression, thought control, demographic abortion, government corruption, spiritual corruption, the reversal of Nature’s collective order and, in due course, a tyrannical anti white state. Don’t believe it? Then step outside the approved parameters of social discourse and express your ethnic pride in a public manner and see what happens. If afterwards you survive by not losing your job, being blackballed by your neighbors and family or bringing down the bottomless fury of an approved non-white “civil rights” group you will need to get busy educating others to help us break the grip of our enemies.
Thanks for your time.
Introduction & Chapter 1 –“Political Correctness:” A Short History of an Ideology
Edited by William S. Lind
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005_docs/PC1.pdf
Chapter II – The Historical Roots of “Political Correctness” by Raymond V. Raehn
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005_docs/PC2.pdf
Chapter III – Political Correctness in Higher Education by T. Kenneth Cribb, Jr.
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005_docs/PC3.pdf
Chapter IV – Political Correctness: Deconstruction and Literature by Jamie McDonald
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005_docs/PC4.pdf
Chapter V – Radical Feminism and Political Correctness by Dr. Gerald L. Atkinson
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005_docs/PC5.pdf
Chapter VI – Further Readings on the Frankfurt School by William S. Lind
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005_docs/PC6.pdf