Provocations as Pretexts for Imperial War: From Pearl Harbor to 9/11

The war against ‘totalitarianism’ becomes the vehicle for total state control for an imperial war.

Wars in an imperialist democracy cannot simply be dictated by executive fiat, they require the consent of highly motivated masses who will make the human and material sacrifices.  Imperialist leaders have to create a visible and highly charged emotional sense of injustice and righteousness to secure national cohesion and overcome the natural opposition to early death, destruction and disruption of civilian life and to the brutal regimentation that goes with submission to absolutist rule by the military.

The need to invent a cause is especially the case with imperialist countries because their national territory is not under threat.  There is no visible occupation army oppressing the mass of the people in their everyday life.  The ‘enemy’ does not disrupt everyday normal life – as forced conscription would and does.  Under normal peaceful time, who would be willing to sacrifice their constitutional rights and their participation in civil society to subject themselves to martial rule that precludes the exercise of all their civil freedoms?

Since the ‘enemy to be’ lacks any saving graces and worst, since the ‘totalitarian state’ controls everything and everybody, no process of internal reform or change is possible.  Hence the defeat of ‘total evil’ can only take place through ‘total war’.  The targeted state and people must be destroyed in order to be redeemed.  In a word, the imperial democracy must regiment and convert itself into a military juggernaut based on mass complicity with imperial war crimes.  The war against ‘totalitarianism’ becomes the vehicle for total state control for an imperial war.

In the case of the US-Japanese war, the US-Korean war, the US-Indochinese war and the post-September 11 war against an independent secular nationalist regime (Iraq) and the Islamic Afghan republic, the Executive branch (with the uniform support of the mass media and congress) provoked a hostile response from its target and fabricated a pretext as a basis for mass mobilization for prolonged and bloody wars.

Continue…

2008-05-26