Baytown Rapist Convicted

Political correctness slowed hunt for black “gay serial sex attacker”

The homosexual serial sex attacker in Texas known as the Baytown Rapist has been found guilty of one count of sexual assault after DNA evidence linked him to one of the series of black on white crimes.

A jury found Keith Hill, 20, guilty after hearing testimony from his shattered teenaged victim, as well as Hill’s confession. The survivor, now 19, said that “I was not sure I was going to make it through the night,” while in Hill’s hands. Hill faces a sentence range of probation to multiple life sentences.

The serial rapist terrorized the Houston area community of Baytown for an eight-month period in 2006. Five young white men in Baytown were sexually assaulted by an attacker whose police description warned about an armed, “clean-shaven black man, 18-21 years old… 5’10”-6′ tall and with a shaved head.” The black male rapist singled out young, “in shape” white males for abuse.Concerns about charges of “racial profiling” led to claims that the pursuit of the Baytown Rapist was being hampered by political correctness, and may in fact have led to further attacks. In a strongly worded article called “Another Associated Press Scandal,” columnist Nicholas Stix charged that the “Associated Press … refused to identify the race of the Baytown rapist’s victims, even though they were almost surely chosen based on their race, and knowing that the black rapist attacks only smallish, frail, young white men is an essential piece of information for potential victims to protect themselves, and for residents to look out for, in preventing further rapes, and possibly helping to catch the assailant.” “Mainstream” media reports of the trial and conviction contain no mention of race.

Stix also lambasted the prevalence of political correctness in police work and the criminal system in general. “Since the rapist is targeting exclusively young white men, we are also talking about racist hate crimes and civil rights violations,” he said. Of course, no such charges were ever brought against Hill.

The rate of interracial rape is overwhelmingly black against white. While this fact is suppressed or glossed over by both laaw enforcement and the media, Stix used Human Rights Watch data to point to a chilling fact that is almost never reported: “since the vast majority of prison rapes are perpetrated by black men, this … has a distinctly racial dimension …” Stix also quoted a Human Rights Watch report on prison sexual  abuse which found that “white inmates are disproportionately targeted for abuse. Although many whites reported being raped by white inmates, black on white abuse appears to be more common.”

Aside from his simple animal instincts, Keith Hill may have been partly driven by the sense of entitlement and hatred of whites consistently reinforced by the mass media and school system. In testimony given at Hill’s first trial, the victim alleged that Hill kidnapped him and demanded his wallet. “You’re going to have to pay for not having any money,” Hill said, before commencing the rape. In his confession, when asked why he beat the white teenager after forcing him to perform a homosexual act, Hill said that “I was mad at him for doing what I told him to do.” It is unknowable, but sickening, to what extent so many young, physically fit men did not fight Hill off because of deeply ingrained propaganda, culled from relentless exposure since childhood, disorienting them about questions of race.

Keith Hill faces additional charges in the case, but no decision has been made on what to do about the four other attacks.

2008-01-15