Thinking About Genocide

“There is one safeguard known generally to the wise, which is an advantage and security to all, but especially to democracies as against despots. What is it? Distrust.” — Demosthenes: Philippic 2, sect. 24

By Frank Roman


SO EXACTLY WHAT do a people need to survive? If you don’t believe that people have a right to exist as distinct nations, cultures or races, then first you need to outline a technique to deny the nuts and bolts of survival. If you wanted to kill a race of people, it would be nothing short of an extremely complex job. Except for a few demented souls I have heard about, everyone I know certainly wouldn’t endorse such a thing. In fact, sane people find the idea vile, with most of us calling it genocide. But you know genocide doesn’t necessarily require the image of physical extermination we get from films; genocide is also effectively carried out by convincing a people that they don’t — or shouldn’t exist as a people. Even that their existence is a blight on the planet and a source of injustice and suffering. In our case, let’s call it “White Guilt.”

Alright then, what would it take to commit genocide? What kind of techniques would be used? Not only that, but who would do such a thing?


In order for a people – any people – to survive, they need to acknowledge and actively pursue a few basic, universal facts. First, like every living thing on earth, a people needs restricted territory, both in terms of living space and for the nourishment the land gives them: food, water and all of the other things the Earth provides which is needed for their continuity.


Secondly, a people need an absolute dedication to the core building block of any society, the family, which means that people must pursue a healthy interest in procreation and the successful raising of offspring, who in turn will create the next generation.


Thirdly, a people need a way to pass on its sense of identity and its history. It needs to relay to the next generation, who in turn will pass them on to the next infinitum, its traditions, mores, and values. How this information is passed on is relative to the age we are talking about. Today, we have to take into account the pervasive existence of popular entertainment and other media, and not just formal education. In other days core values were transmitted by widely understood customs, myths and religious precepts that all adhered to common principles seen as necessary for the common benefit. 


Fourth, in order for a people to survive, they have to have their own form of government and social organization, a government that shares the people’s values and traditions and will uphold them against any ill wind that blows its way. It has to represent its people because it has to be built by the very people who want it. The structure of that government can be negotiated. But the one thing that cannot be negotiated away is who the government represents. If it does not symbolize the people who built it then it will most certainly represent whoever may have hijacked it – to serve their purposes. If that happens, then social dissolution and conflict arise. Speaking in up-to-date terms, if “your” government amounts to a mixed bag of different peoples scrambling for power in a pseudo-tolerance-mandated, multicultural social order such the one the West is suffering today, then paralysis sets in. Such an atomized society offers protection to those who rule and seek to exploit their prey. Currently, the powers that be have fairly successfully setup up just such a system, one that, at least for now, is easier to control with obfuscation and arbitrary penalties rather than truthfulness and integrity, and you know it.


In 2005 Emmanuel Todd, a well-known social scientist based in France, saw America’s decline looming when he said “…God is not saving America these days. [He] sees evil all around, but this happens because things in the country itself are taking a bad turn. This degradation compels us to realize what we are losing: America of 1950-1965, a land of massive democracy, freedom of self-expression, expansion of social rights, and defense of human rights. It was the country of the good.” Now there isn’t much we can agree on with the very liberal Mr. Todd, but it is sadly true that our “country of the good” has taken a bad turn, a very bad turn. If you didn’t think so, you probably wouldn’t be listening to my voice now. In the name of “tolerance,” globalism, “diversity” and political correctness, America’s rulers have taken the foundational principles of our nation, distilled from millenia of European thought and experience, and ruined this land. From campus speech codes to affirmative action, to targeted political prosecutions of dissidents, to imperial, unwinnable wars; from unchecked, massive Third World immigration to the undermining of European-American holidays and other public expressions, and from the offshoring of the US economy to the corruption at all levels of government, America has lost much of her essence and is on the road to oblivion. The dumbing down and ruination of the public school system. Shallowness and materialism worshipped as the essence of “freedom.” The pervasiveness of gutter filth peddled to the youth as “culture.” The gutting of the middle class. The militarization of the police. The list is endless. And again, all these changes were sold to us not as acts of de facto genocide, but as “progress.”


In fact, Emmanuel Todd and people like him probably think that undermining our nation’s racial, cultural, and political identity during the 60s was a good thing, part of that “massive democracy” he talks about. Those were the days of abominations such as the Civil Rights Act of 1965, which began the racial chaos we see all around the nation today, and the same year’s Immigration Reform Act, which threw open our gates to Third World immigration. But the most terrible effects of those acts were not seen for more than a few years. Therefore its vital to understand that Todd’s point stands within the context of a 1965 America that was 90% European American, a nation comprised of the people of Europe who dropped their old loyalties, intermarried and became Americans, part of the Melting Pot. Our freedom of expression, our social and human rights, and the respect and growth we enjoyed were all signs of a homogenous society that worked exactly the way the people who designed it wanted it to work, but that was then. This is now: oh sure, many of our people today will tell you we are still the country of the good because they can shop till they drop, vote, and get a tax refund. They will tell you we do indeed live in the “land of the free and the home of the brave” because Wal Mart keeps its shelves stocked and the corner tavern still serves the coldest beer in town. Unfortunately they have been conditioned on multiple fronts to believe that fighting and dying to preserve these kinds of things is a true form of patriotism, an idea that John Jay and Alexis DeTocqueville would have had a good horse-laugh over.


Today many of these same people who criticize the loss of civil liberties under “democracy” are the same folks who are transforming America into a multicultural basket case. Those who decry the loss of privacy and freedom congratulate the ongoing immigration of non-Whites in greater numbers. You can hear them on the radio and see them on the idiot box everyday be they neo-conservatives or flaming liberals. What these corporate shills don’t understand — or simply won’t tell you — is that Third World peoples and free societies are mutually exclusive. Culture and behavior have genetic roots and no amount of “hate laws” or public school indoctrination can change that. You see, the free society I was talking about earlier, built by Jefferson and Washington, works fine when the people are genetically similar to Jefferson and Washington. But it breaks down completely when the people are genetically closer to Pancho Villa, Idi Amin, and Osama bin Laden. Indeed, preventing European Americans from doing anything about our removal and replacement, preventing us from even thinking about our own continued way of life as a people — preventing us from undoing what the so-called civil rights groups, tolerance mongers, pulpit finger-puppets and globalists have done to us — is the real reason the media, the churches, the universities and the government treat European American advocates as if we are the essence of evil cloaked in material form, while black and brown racial activists and their organizations are not only held up as heroes, they are actually financed by corporate America. And all the while politicians fight each other for the privilege of pandering for their support. Hillary Clinton even puts on a “black-cent” like Al Jolson in hopes of selling her particular brand of poison. Such puerile and pathetic behavior is laughable — or would be, if it weren’t indicative of the currency of politics in America these days. 


Treachery and deception characterize media spokesmen, politicians, bureaucrats and a slew of other public figures who have been conditioned to turn away from the original intent of not only the founding of our nation but of their very own identity as a people, as a race. While they extol the virtues of Third World homogeneity and those who work for it they curse America’s and those who work to salvage it. This kind of lying and posturing is indicative of more than just private failings. It’s a sign of a breakdown of our civilization, our government, our institutions, our liberty and even our very identity as a people. In short, they are doing everything in their power to exterminate us because the system we now have in place just about guarantees the success of power-mongering and lying for personal gain.

On our European Americans United homepage, we say and believe the following:


“In any given nation, cultures and civilizations are the result of the experience of the basic foundational people and their values. In Europe and European-derived nations like America, our people are under the demographic threat of unchecked Third World immigration and the consequent destruction of our unique way of life. As more and more Third World immigrants pour across our borders in America and Europe, they will unquestionably change our traditions, our cultures, and even our forms of government.


“Our ideals of democracy, individual freedom, and personal responsibility are unique and exist in this form among no other peoples of the world; we wish to preserve these ideals and pass them along to future generations of European Americans.

“We recognize that, should our nation ever attain a non-European majority, our ways of life will be forever lost; they will be replaced by the ways of life cherished by the Third World populations who will then control our political process. America’s culture and political system will then, of course, simply reflect its Third World majority—it will begin to resemble Mexico, or Haiti, or Cuba. In European Americans United, we want more for our children and the future generations of our families.”

 European Americans United is only one expression of the growing sense across the Western world that not only is there a crisis confronting us as a collective civilization, but that the status quo is part of the crisis itself. European Americans United seeks to influence and help to guide elements of the growing resistance to the total destruction of the West as we know it. That resistance is taking numerous forms and will only continue to swell, simply because the present establishment has created an untenable situation that will only grow worse because of the inherent fault lines built in. All the talk about “tolerance” is a smoke-screen: only continued government manipulation and repression is capable of keeping the appearance of a functioning civilization. As more and more of our people are forced to confront the facts behind the lies, committed people like those of us in European Americans United must be prepared to offer serious, effective and honest alternatives to people whose collective social power has the latent force within it needed to save their world. We seek to answer the question of what a people — our people — need to survive, and to help to come up with strategies and tactics to achieve those needed changes as part of a program. Won’t you consider offering your talents to this great and world-historical project?