Immigration: A Reminder From 1965, 1986, and 2007

In lieu of the ongoing screamfest by moonbats and RINO‘s over Arizona’s tepid little immigration enforcement act, it is important to bear in mind how this episode began and how it fits into a broader, more deadly outcome. — Ed.

In an article in the Los Angeles Times by Gregory Rodriguez, that wasn’t all together ridiculous, this point was made. 

But that doesn’t make it right. No matter who wins the presidency, there is one thing we ought to learn from this campaign. In our rapidly diversifying nation, where we are all becoming minorities, the idea that any given group has an inalienable claim on a particular political seat, appointment or office based on demographics has officially outlived its usefulness. The fear of white decline – Los Angeles Times (2008)

Here is what Teddy, yes the same Teddy who is lying in a hospital facing his maker, well here is what he said back in 1965 then what he said in 1986 then what he said in 2007. At least he is a consistent liar.

1965: “The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.”

1986: “This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this.”

2007: “Now it is time for action. 2007 is the year we must fix our broken system.

So now we find whites in America nearly a minority, after being nearly 90% of the population when that bastard spewed those lies. Yea, Teddy was good for this country. That bastard hated this country and spent his life trying to destroy it. And truth is he probably did.

So who is going to replace the whites in America as the leaders? Well the very same folks who made such a hash of their own countries that they ran away and came here. Mexico was at last check number 5 on the All World Murdering Capital. In other cheery news, in Mexico rape is not really considered to be a crime. And it is REALLY better to rape children because the law in Mexico, such as it is, protects them even less. Well ok you might serve a day in jail, till you sober up. But pretty much it is considered a-ok to rape. And Gangs? Hell Mexico is Gangs-R-Us of this hemisphere. Yea sure lets import a bunch of these folks.

Just think in a few more years we can expect Los Angeles to look like this…

Oops wrong set of slides…this is what Southern California already looks like. Wow…well in a few more years it will look like this.

 

That diversity thingy is working out well for Southern California. Iraq, Somalia, Vietnam the list goes on of countries where we have expended much treasure and blood trying to make them something they are not. Perhaps liberal democratic republics cannot be given to folks. If that is the case then maybe it is not such a great idea to be importing in the United States millions of folks who have no idea what we mean when we say law abiding. Law abiding people, people smart enough to understand that mutual respect of the law is the only thing that keeps us away from the visions of disaster that are such a part of those countries south of our border.

What was that bastard Kennedy thinking of when he uttered those lies in 1965?

2010-04-28