“Voters have obviously had their fill of divisive rhetoric, catchy slogans and shameless demagoguery passed off as solutions to the immigration problem. And they’re letting the candidates know it.”
By Selwyn Duke
With the victories of Mike Huckabee and John McCain in the first two primary contests and Mitt Romney’s recently falling star, a fiction is being bandied about: The anti-amnesty position wasn’t playing well in Peoria.
A good example is this San Diego Union-Tribune piece titled “Lesson Learned?” It’s dishonest pablum, with more spin than a whirling dervish on speed.
The editors begin with a convenient characterization, stating that amnesty proponents Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Huckabee and McCain are prevailing while opponents are faltering; Romney is losing the race and Tom Tancredo has left it. A few slippery paragraphs down the rabbit hole, a triumphant proclamation follows:
“Voters have obviously had their fill of divisive rhetoric, catchy slogans and shameless demagoguery passed off as solutions to the immigration problem. And they’re letting the candidates know it.”
The truth is just the opposite.The “divisive rhetoric, catchy slogans and shameless demagoguery passed off as solutions to the immigration problem” voters have had their fill of emanate from the scamnesty side. And the candidates know it. This is why every presidential contender either pleads the fifth on illegal immigration or proposes to deep-six it.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/01/msm_trying_to_kill_the_immigra.html