Profits and short term gain caused them to be blinded to the Marxist rot growing in their midst and around the world.
by Frank Roman
There are many things going on in the world today that call for our attention. Yet in spite of our ability to electronically receive this information in the flash of a few seconds everything simply cannot be assimilated in a manner that is beneficial to all of our people. But as select groups certainly know, especially those who read, contribute to and listen to Western Voices World News, there will always be that one story that catches one’s attention; making an indelible mark in their mind and possibly even spurring them to talk about it or even act. Your host is no exception to this rule and I’d like to get your thoughts on a particular news item.
A few days ago I came across a report concerning Russia and China’s vetoes of the American-led U.N. Security Council effort to implement targeted sanctions on Zimbabwe’s “president” Robert Mugabe.
It seems the U.S. Government offered a straightforward Security Council resolution, calling for an arms embargo on Zimbabwe (formerly known as Rhodesia), the selection of a U.N. moderator, plus travel and financial restrictions on the tyrant Mugabe and a number of his top military and government cronies for stealing the recent Zimbabwe election through blatant acts of violence and intimidation. Western Voices World News and others has chronicled in detail just exactly what – not who-- Robert Mugabe is: a white hating black supremacist and murderous sociopath whose iron rule over his own people, not to mention the ethnic cleansing of the white farmers who (nominally) fed and employed his people, can almost be described as demonic (See here and here)
Video follows text, below -- FR
Russia and China argued the targeted sanctions that the U.S. and others wanted to impose on Mugabe’s gang exceeded the Security Council’s mandate, believing such practices to be illegitimate and dangerous; describing the resolution as an attempt to take the Council beyond its charter privilege. In other words they didn’t want to meddle in the internal affairs of Zimbabwe and elevate the recent fraudulent election, and resultant violence, to an international level. And then there is South African president Thabo Mbeki, another white-hating black supremacist who has done everything he can to prevent any meaningful U.N. pressure such as sanctions on the Mugabe dictatorship. Of course as informed racially aware European Americans already know it was international economic sanctions that brought down South Africa’s apartheid government, which had allegedly “oppressed” that country’s blacks. So as far as Mugabe and Mbeki are concerned, when whites persecute blacks, no amount of U.N. sanctions is too much. But when blacks persecute blacks (and whites as they did over the last decade), any amount of U.N. sanctions is too much. Zimbabwe’s Ambassador (Boniface Chidyausiku) said the Security Council had refused to be "intimidated" by Britain -- former “colonial ruler” of Zimbabwe -- and the United States. “The United Nations has stuck to the Charter," he said. Voting for the resolution were the United States, Britain, France, Italy, Belgium, Croatia, Burkina Faso, Panama and Costa Rica. Indonesia abstained.
What an absolute shame the United States and Britain are more concerned NOW with a fraudulent election taking place in the Third World** and the oppression of blacks by blacks. The same US and Britain who were utterly silent for over a decade as their blood kinsmen, the white farmers, were ethnically cleansed. Of course the record will show the US and Britain helped to initiate Africa’s white dispossession -- by shrieking and screaming to the press like leftist college girls to end apartheid and the alleged “suffering” of black Africans. You never saw white people murdering blacks like we see today because it rarely if ever happened. At worst there were attempts to stop rival tribes from hacking each other to death, though it was not always successful. But the blacks who are now murdering their own people and maintaining bureaucratic corruption in true Marxist fashion now control the governments of South Africa and Zimbabwe; requiring a sham vote in the UN to stop Africa’s mud slide into oblivion with all parties responsible for it acting outraged and self righteous. And what an unconditional disgrace I personally feel toward Russia whose economic interests in the region never supplanted the death and misery of the white farmers who fed Africa, who are for all intents and purposes Russia’s extended racial family. Like the United States and Britain, Russia remained wholly silent as the executions, hangings, land grabs, rapes, tortures, dispossession and whole sale ethnic cleaning of the white Rhodesian and South African Boers --this from a country whose current leadership has seen and understands the consequences of their own demographic loss and is offering incentives for more ethnic Russians to reproduce.
In the 1950s Rhodesia and South Africa were flourishing countries that reflected only the best of Britain and other Europeans who joined them. They were among the finest places in the world to visit, work and live in. Both countries had to work hard to develop their farms and modern infrastructure. But with that kind of success inevitably comes greed, those who feel the need to exploit and corrupt, and plain old fashioned stupidity as profits and short term gain caused them to be blinded to the Marxist rot growing in their midst and around the world. Unbearable economic and political pressure was put on South Africa especially, with Rhodesia holding out till the bitter end. Because nothing has ever been done about this horrific situation in Africa’s southern hemisphere should tell you that the wrong people who refused to stop the carnage are still in power; the wrong propaganda is still being transmitted, the wrong politically correct interests are overshadowing everything; and only a handful of the right people care enough about this issue for the right reasons to even say anything about it. Now there are farms and cities in South Africa and Zimbabwe, which were successful when run by whites, have collapsed under black supervision and are abandoned with many of those whites now dead. And never mind the fact more prisons have been built after apartheid. But even that is not enough to cope with government oppression and crime. More blacks are in prison after apartheid than before because they no longer fear the police or have even a scrap of responsibility to the most menial jobs that used to be available under apartheid. No, apartheid wasn’t a perfect system but, at least for both the white farmers and the black population, it had democratic safeguards in place that prevented the only kind of rule Third World hell holes know how to produce: communist-styled dictatorships, which goes a long way to partially explain at least why Russia and China don’t seem to have an issue with the past and present state of Zimbabwe and South Africa. Then again, I have an instinct either China or Russia, nor any of the other nations that voted for or against this hypocritical too little too late pissant UN resolution would tolerate the genocide of their respective people at the hands of African savages.
Clearly, we have a situation in which we hardly ever hear anything at all about South Africa and Zimbabwe in the media, except when black tyrannical dictators kill fellow blacks and hold rigged elections. Up until recently the media and their underlings, who superficially call themselves world leaders, have led all of us to believe that everything must be fine in Africa’s southern hemisphere; that blacks and whites have been living in multicultural bliss ever since apartheid was dismantled. Today we have the same people, the same moneyed select few, still trying to get rid of white people wherever they may live. Let’s take a lesson from this sad situation in Africa and strive to keep today’s European Americans -- and the leaders who have yet to come -- out of harm’s way…for all of the right reasons.
Thanks for your time.
Zimbabwe was once a British colony (called Rhodesia) and Britain did nothing when the local white minority seized independence. It took 15 years of war and tens of thousands of African lives to overthrow the white minority, and at the end Britain promised to provide large amounts of money to buy out the white farmers who still owned most of the country’s good land. Then it reneged on its promise.
A very close ally to Zimbabwe, Mozambique is still one of the poorest countries in the world and desperate to stop more refugees from Zimbabwe flooding across its border. It has, however, benefited from the arrival of many white farmers from Zimbabwe.
"The media have conveniently forgotten that Mandela was a hard-core Communist. He drank deeply at the well of anti-American Communist theory, and it has never left his system. Those astonished at his apologetics for Saddam Hussein -- "Israel has weapons of mass destruction" but Hussein doesn't, according to Mandela -- should remember that he has played defense for madmen and thugs before. His ramshackle South African government maintained ties with Fidel Castro and Muammar Qaddafi. And long before that, he was responsible for a pamphlet called "How To Be A Good Communist" in which he praised the "genius" of Marx, Lenin and Stalin.
America was one of the capitalist countries Mandela wanted the Soviets to trample. "The cause of Communism is the greatest and most arduous cause in the history of mankind," the pamphlet stated. "Our aim is to change the present world into a Communist world where there will be no exploiters and exploited, no oppressor and oppressed, no rich and poor." He thought a "Communist world is capable of attainment" -- since Communism had succeeded so brilliantly in the USSR, China and the Eastern Bloc. But it would require beating the hell out of capitalists: "the Communist movement still faces powerful enemies which must be crushed and wiped out from the face of the earth before a Communist world can be realized. Without a hard and bitter and long struggle against capitalism and exploitation, there can be no Communist world." -- Front Page.com
"For whenever a white man seeks to live among them (blacks) as their equals they will either destroy him or devour him. And they will destroy all of his work." "Never fraternize with them as equals. Never accept them as your social equals or they will devour you. They will destroy you." Albert Schweitzer, Recipient of the 1952 Nobel Peace Prize.
On the 13th of January, 1995, The Jewish Chronicle said:
"The African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa was guided by two Communist Jews, Albie Sachs, 'one of its foremost intellectuals'and Yossel Mashel Slovo (Joe Slovo.)
Slovo was born in a shtetl in Lithuania and grew up speaking Yiddish and studying the Talmud. He joined the ANC's terrorist wing, the Umkhonto we Sizwe, in 1961 and eventually became its commander. He was named Secretary General of the South African Communist Party in 1986.