Why on earth would Congress advise violent militarised reactions against its own peaceful* constituents? The answer is straightforward....
US citizens of all political persuasions are still reeling from images of unparallelled police brutality in a coordinated crackdown against peaceful OWS protesters in cities across the nation this past week. An elderly woman was pepper-sprayed in the face; the scene of unresisting, supine students at UC Davis being pepper-sprayed by phalanxes of riot police went viral online; images proliferated of young women – targeted seemingly for their gender – screaming, dragged by the hair by police in riot gear; and the pictures of a young man, stunned and bleeding profusely from the head, emerged in the record of the middle-of-the-night clearing of Zuccotti Park.
Why this massive mobilisation against these
not-yet-fully-articulated, unarmed, inchoate people? After all,
protesters against the war in Iraq, Tea Party rallies and others have
all proceeded without this coordinated crackdown. Is it really the
camping? As I write, two hundred young people, with sleeping bags,
suitcases and even folding chairs, are still camping out all night and
day outside of NBC on public sidewalks – under the benevolent eye of an
NYPD cop – awaiting Saturday Night Live tickets, so surely the camping
is not the issue. I was still deeply puzzled as to why OWS, this
hapless, hopeful band, would call out a violent federal response.
That is, until I found out what it was that OWS actually wanted.
* While it is true many participants in the OWS movement tried to articulate justifiable grievances, we cannot lose site of the fact Occupy also attracted large numbers of violent leftists, not to mention uninformed 'hangers on,' whose short sighted actions and vapid words neutralized the movements potential effectiveness. --Ed.