A media service of European Americans United

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Forum
  • About Us
  • Search
  • Action Alerts
  • FLYERS
  • Free Podcasts
  • Stories by Author
  • New Online Store
  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Links
    Blogs

  • Frank Roman
  • John Young
  • Garden Blog




  • User Menu

  • Register
  • Login
  • Logout
  • Submit News

  • Email This Page


    Syndication Feeds

  • Handheld/PDA
  • XML News Feeds
  • View Sidebar
  • Mozilla Sidebar

  • 28


     
    The Racist Drug Test
    Political Correctness; Posted on: 2011-07-21 07:27:04 [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]
    When all else fails shriek 'racism' loud and clear

    On May 31, Florida Governor Rick Scott signed into law a bill requiring all cash benefit recipients on welfare to be drug tested, not requiring those who only receive food stamps. The welfare bill requires that the welfare recipients pay for their drug test, which can range anywhere from $10 to $100, but they will be reimbursed on their initial welfare payout if they pass. If one does fail the drug test, then they become ineligible for a year. If, after failing, one shows proof of successfully completing drug treatment then this one year is dropped to 6 months. Failing the test twice makes a potential welfare recipient ineligible for 3 years.


    Governor Scott has already been sued twice by the ACLU earlier in June, and now may face a third suit in response to this bill. Back in 1999 a similar law was passed in Michigan, but was declared unconstitutional in 2000 by a United States District Court in violation of the fourth amendment in argument that “suspicionless drug testing” violates our protection of unreasonable searches and seizures.

     

    But is that really a good argument? In an interview with WPTV News, Sen. Gary Siplin, (D) Orlando, said that this is essentially Rick Scott saying that all welfare recipients are drug dealers. Ridiculous. And in a recent article in The Economist, Maria Kayanan, of the ACLU in Florida, is quoted saying that the bill is “patriarchal, racist and mean-spirited” which is another outrageous claim. How is blanket drug testing of ALL welfare recipients racist?

     

    The counter-argument from Scott and supporters is that this is going to help protect taxpayers’ money.  Since it is the taxpayers that are paying the bill and they have to be drug free for their jobs, why not test the very people who are using their money? It is also very beneficial for families, as it will help to push those who do use drugs to either make better life decisions and stop or lose their income.

     

    The goal is not to target minorities or be racist; it is simply to have those who use taxpayer money to show proof of where it is going. If it is coming out of my paycheck and I am losing some of my hard-earned money, then I would love to see that a family is buying clothes and food for their children and providing shelter. Where’s the harm in that?

    News Source: politikool

    Related Stories
  • Poking The Racist Beehive (Or: A Study In "Progressive" Hatemongering)
  • The Truth About 'Hate Crimes' and the Racial Justice Racket

  • Comments

    Entire site copyright ©2007-2008 European Americans United.
    Opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of EAU,
    the editors, or any other entity. Some clearly marked materials are
    parodies or fiction. By submitting material you grant European
    Americans United a non-transferable 100 year non-exclusive license
    to use the submitted material.
    The following copyright pertains to the news site software only:
    Copyright ©Copyright (C) 2007-2013
    Powered by Esselbach Storyteller CMS System Version 1.8
    Licensed to: European Americans United