· Content
· News
· Files
· Links
· Forums
· Western Voices Store
· Our Amazon Affiliate
· Print-On-Demand Store
· Old News Site
Welcome to our website
To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.
The Shifting Definition of Tolerance
Posted by: Frank Roman on: 03/23/2013 10:49 PM [ Print | 0 comment(s) ]
Until recently in our national history, tolerance referred to non discrimination. It meant civility in the political arena, in other words, respecting the right of others to express their views, even if we do not agree with them. It meant treating all people with decency and respect. Such tolerance is an important and vital part of our heritage. Today, however, the world is in danger of abandoning all sense of absolute right or wrong, all morality and virtue, replacing them with an all encompassing “tolerance” that no longer means what it once meant. An extreme definition of tolerance is now widespread that implicitly or explicitly endorses the right of every person to choose their own morality, even their own “truth,” as though morality and truth were mere matters of personal preference.
This extreme tolerance culminates in a refusal to recognize any fixed standards or draw moral distinctions of any kind. Few dare say no to the “almighty self” or suggest that some so-called “lifestyles” may be destructive, contrary to higher law, or simply wrong. When tolerance is so inflated out of all proportions, it means the death of virtue, for the essence of morality is to draw clear distinctions between right and wrong. All virtue requires saying no firmly and courageously to all that is morally bankrupt. Curiously enough, this new modern tolerance is often a one-way street. Those who practice it expect everyone to tolerate them in anything they say or do, but show no tolerance themselves toward those who express differing viewpoints or defend traditional morality. Indeed, their intolerance is often most barbed toward those of religious conviction. But let there be no misunderstanding or deception, the First Amendment right of free speech applies to religious speech as well as to other kinds of speech. Believers of all faiths have every right to participate in and share their convictions in the public arena.
Adapted from an address given at a conference held at Brigham Young University on March 5, 2010.

































