by Urs Gehriger

"Excuse me", Tucker Carlson apologizes as his assistant, Emily, ushers me into his airy Fox News office in the Washington DC bureau. The phone on his desk is ringing.

"This probably should be quick", Carlson promises as he picks up.

Every minute is tightly planned in Tucker Carlson's studio. He is the break out cable news star of the year in US media. 2.7 million Americans turn on Fox News every night to watch the preppy tribune of the forgotten man. Carlson's new book, "Ship of Fools", has vaulted to number one on the New York Times best-seller list unseating Bob Woodward's "Fear" after four weeks in the top spot.

Carlson spins fast laps in the office, phone to his ear. “Hey. No, it's totally fine. I told the guy to fuck off.” From his mouth spills a torrent of profanities. His facial expressions change like clouds in a storm gust. "What? No. Stop!”, he shouts. “I'm not a whiny victim.”

Carlson’s past month off air has been turbulent. Anti-fascist goons besieged his Washington DC home. His wife Susie was alone inside when the mob pounded on the front door and shouted, "Tucker, we know where you sleep at night!" Terrified, Susie barricaded herself in the pantry and called the police for help.

It cannot be stressed enough that this agreement is not about refugees fleeing persecution, or their rights to protection under international law. Instead, the agreement propagates the radical idea that migration -- for any reason -- is something that needs to be promoted, enabled and protected.

The UN has no interest in admitting that its agreement promotes migration as a human right; until recently, there has been little debate about it. More debate might risk jeopardizing the entire project.

UN member states are not only supposed to open their borders for the migrants of the world, but should also help them pick and choose their future country by providing them with comprehensive information about each country they may wish to settle in.

For nearly 40 years, Jim Riley and his family have lived on their 760-acre apple farm in Oak Glen, California, in San Bernardino County.

Jim and his wife built a Colonial-inspired home on the farm in 1994, and were thinking about doing 18th century dinner theater. Shortly thereafter, the Rileys were approached by parents of local elementary school students asking for historical field trips at the farm. “We started doing American Revolution-themed tours, and Civil War reenactments for 5th graders in Southern California,” Riley said when we talked recently. “Within five years, we were seeing 50,000 students a year, and in the last 17 years, more than 1.2 million students, parents and teachers visited programs on the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, and the California Gold Rush.”

Riley described the events as an escape to the 18th century, where school children are met and harassed by Redcoats as they arrive at the farm. “It’s all American for people who love America,” Riley said.

However, schools recently began cancelling reservations for the Riley Farm historical reenactments.

Since the Left uses racism as the battering ram to enforce an egalitarian agenda to redistribute resources from Whites to other "people of color," hate is a topical subject that has not received enough attention in terms of empirical data. For example, research on altruism and sexual selection—to name just two—can fill volumes. But hate, has not been studied as intensely as the other areas of human emotions, so when I saw the book The Psychology of Hate, edited by Robert J. Sternberg, 2004, it was a must read.

First, any study of hate is inclusive of disgust, fear, and anger and should include the broad categories of ethnocentrism and its other side—xenophobia. As such, studying hate cannot be undertaken without also including the genetic component that has evolved and why and in what ways humans hate as a means of improving individual and especially group fitness within the study of group evolutionary strategies.

Unfortunately, this book failed miserably as an empirical attempt to understand hate, and instead leaned heavily towards simplistic formulations to try and eliminate hate by merely describing it, and implicating Whites most often in its cause and effect on others. I really didn't expect anything else, but occasionally surprises do happen. I know Robert J. Sternberg's work, and he comes from the Marxist wing of the deniers of racial differences. With Sternberg as editor, I suspected this book would be biased, and I was correct. So the best I can do, rather than shed any more light on the evolutionary basis of hate, anger, fear and disgust, is to shed some light on how even today's psychology is very close to the Standard Social Science Model (SSSM), and therefore unable to produce good research.

Recently, I arrived at a moment of introspection about a curious aspect of my own behavior. When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have. But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out. This hesitancy is a consequence of the different treatment one tends to receive from those on the Right and Left when expressing a difference of opinion. I am not, as it turns out, the only one who has noticed this.

Melissa Chen @MsMelChen

I'm a centrist: I hold some conservative views and some liberal views.

But I'm more afraid of talking to my liberal friends about my conservative views than I am talking to my conservative friends about my liberal views.
17.2K
4:46 PM - Jan 16, 2018

“That’s a stupid fucking question,” answered a Socialist Alliance activist when I asked sincerely where they were getting what sounded like inflated poverty statistics. “If you don’t believe in gay marriage or gun control, unfriend me,” demand multiple Facebook statuses from those I know. “That’s gross and racist!” spluttered a red-faced Ben Affleck when the atheist and neuroscientist Sam Harris criticized Islamic doctrines on Bill Maher’s Real Time. Nobody blinks an eye when Harris criticizes Christianity, least of all Affleck, who starred in Kevin Smith’s irreverent religious satire Dogma. But Christians are not held to be a sacrosanct and protected minority on the political Left. As Skeptic Magazine’s Michael Shermer tweeted recently:

All white advocates should salute The New York Times. Week after week, one author after another openly declares his intention to replace us with non-white immigrants. It’s nice to know where we stand, and to know we were right all along. A few weeks ago, it was Charles Blow. Today, it was Michelle Goldberg, in an op-ed with the blunt title, “We Can Replace Them.”

Miss Goldberg refers in her column to the recent violent attack on a Pittsburgh synagogue by a man who believed Donald Trump was too friendly to Jews and who did not vote for him. She also refers to the bomb threats made by a scarcely-white Trump supporter, a career criminal who claimed to be a Seminole Indian and is the son of a Filipino immigrant. Somehow, for her, they symbolize white people who vote for Donald Trump.

“Right now America is tearing itself apart as an embittered white conservative minority clings to power, terrified at being swamped by a new multicultural polyglot majority,” she writes. “The divide feels especially stark in Georgia, where the midterm election is a battle between Trumpist reaction [white Republican Brian Kemp] and the multicultural America [black Democrat Stacey Abrams] whose emergence the right is trying, at all costs, to forestall.”

by Mark Point

It’s obvious that in a post-Obama America the anti-white zeitgeist is out of pandora’s box. Whether it was always lurking beneath the language of multiculturalism and diversity is for historians to figure out. What’s obvious is that when mainstream media personalities like Don Lemon or New York Times employees like Sarah Jeong freely spew textbook anti-white racism the world takes notice, the Overton window shifts and the temperature rises in the frog-pot. Over in Canada, in Europe and Australia whites are under attack. Due to unprecedented immigration and fatalist progressive experiments, there is no country where anti-white cultural currents are not rising. It wasn’t supposed to be this way, weakness, wealth transfers, preferential treatment, open borders and accommodation were supposed to invite warm feelings, equal outcomes and racial blindness.

It’s not the older conservatives but younger ones and future generations who are facing an unpleasant and unprecedented future if this trajectory continues. Not without reason are Millennials questioning the byzantine social codes and power dynamics they inherited from Boomers. Unlike Cold Warrior conservatives who were raised in communities with high social trust whose unifying threat was Eastern communism, Millennials were the first guinea pigs in the “racial blindness” experiment their elders enlisted them into.

Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) isn’t going to lose on Tuesday, but that’s not why this comment from Donald Trump Jr., the president’s oldest son and of his most popular surrogates, is so important:

Donald Trump Jr.
✔
@DonaldJTrumpJr

Angus King is a Fake Independent who votes with Schumer 88% of the time. Angus wants to repopulate Maine with Syrian and Somalian refugees. Support @SenatorBrakey who fights for secure borders and Better Jobs for Maine. #me #maine
12:43 PM - Nov 3, 2018

Often when conservative politicians talk about their opposition to large groups of non-white immigrants, they couch it in the rhetoric of “bad apples.” Saying you’re worried about MS-13, for instance, is a more socially acceptable argument than simply saying you don’t like Central Americans—people who should know better might even defend you when you do it. In this tweet, Trump isn’t offering misplaced fears about, I don’t know, Al-Shabaab or something. He’s not couching it in anything, there are no dots to connect; he just doesn’t want Somalis, full-stop. Having Somalis in your community is bad, on its surface, simply because they’re Somalis—that’s it, that’s the argument.

The sense that the nation’s culture and way of life have dramatically changed is reflected in a PRRI “American Values” survey that gauged both political opinions and “cultural alienation.”

It found that 47 percent of Americans now say that things have changed so much, they “feel like a stranger in their own country.” A slim majority (51 percent) disagree.

Nearly six in 10 Republicans say that things have changed so much they feel alienated; 42 percent of Democrats agree.

Was there a better era to live in? Americans are divided on whether the country’s culture and way of life has changed for the better or worse since the 1950s. Fifty percent say such change is for the better, while 47 percent say culture has gotten worse according to the survey survey.

by John Young




The Apostles of Epic Evil are unabashedly inconsistent with their own stated principles. Instead, straight out of Rules for Radicals, they attempt to turn our own principles against us as a form of suicide pact. Little by little, we on the Right have understood that you cannot give your enemy the benefit of principles to which your enemy does not himself adhere. And as we have stopped treating our enemies as merely misinformed “friends,” we have finally started to make inroads in culture and politics for the first time in decades.

Of course, the Leftist-Globalist Axis of Evil does not have principles as such. Instead, they have ambitions. Anything that advances their ambition is undertaken, no matter what principles must be overthrown.

The Left was long a champion for the First Amendment, especially when it pertained to flooding local convenience stores or the Internet with pornography, making sure open communists could attain tenure in colleges, or they could use it to remove Christian symbols from graves or town property. But now that they are in a position where the First Amendment is being used to challenge their hegemony, they are looking for every possible excuse to set the Bill of Right on fire, and burn it into nonexistence.

Though the principles of the Axis of Evil do not really exist and hence appear inconsistent without regard to their words, their goals are clear and never waver. Anything that can possibly be used to advance the cause of white genocide or the destruction of our traditional freedoms is seized upon and played to the utmost.

Gab is a small competitor of Twitter whose distinctive selling point is free speech. By way of contrast, Facebook and Twitter have employed tens of thousands of people in what they call an “election war room” dedicated to bringing about Leftist and Globalist results in the upcoming election by systematically limiting and de-platforming anyone opposed to their agenda. Gab has no such efforts in place, allowing free-wheeling discussion that includes all aspects of the spectrum ranging from Jewish feminists and Neocons all the way to neo-Monarchists and the nationalist right.

Twitter and Facebook actively colluded to try to deny Bolsonaro the election in Brazil, whereas Gab gave all candidates and their supporters free rein.

Of course, Gab is dramatically different from these other platforms in other ways as well. WHO pays for Twitter and Facebook? Advertisers. WHO pays for Gab? Its users. This is fundamental because with Facebook and Twitter, you get the service for free because YOU (and all your personal info) are the PRODUCT whose attention and information is provided to the people who pay them. (Including shadowy government agencies.) In contrast, with Gab, you are the CUSTOMER. Gab just recently raised over $1M from its regular users to pay for its expansion. Though powered by a dedicated personality in the personage of Andrew Torba, what makes Gab possible is that its users appreciate free speech strongly enough to support it with their wallets.

Free speech is a problem for our enemies, because for decades they controlled virtually all press and could control outcomes of elections by controlling the information available that people could use to make decisions. With the Internet, that control started to break down. Though there has long been an effort, spearheaded by the Anti-Defamation League, to remove websites or alter search algorithms, the enemies of freedom went into full-blown panic with the election of Trump in 2016. Though Trump is certainly not “our guy,” he is opposed to the Leftist-Globalist plantation, so his election sent shock waves throughout the Leftist-Globalist Axis of Evil and the Deep State. They discovered that free speech online is not merely a fringe threat, but poses a very real threat to their hegemony.

With the number of hate crimes and xenophobic parties growing across the continent, members of the European Parliament passed a resolution in Strasbourg that condemned the lack of serious action against extremist groups, including neo-Nazis.

The text, which was endorsed by 355 parliamentarians, specifically pointed to incidents such as the attack by right-wing terrorist Anders Brevik that killed 77 people, 48 of whom were under 18, in Norway in 2011, the murder of UK MP Jo Cox by a supporter of Brexit in 2016, and a recent attack by neo-Fascist gangs in Italy against European Parliamentarian Eleonora Forenza.

The text also warned of the rise of right-wing extremist groups like the German National Socialist Underground, as well as Golden Dawn’s growing presence in Greece, and the spike in the number of hate crime-related shootings and murders that have targeted immigrants in Italy.

by Mind Weapon



In 2040, there will still be human hierarchy.

What sort of man will be the elite?

What new and unforeseen forces will have shaped society between now and 2040?

Being energy literate, it is still a safe bet that the Corn Syrup Cornucopia is going to fail, and humanity will feel widespread hunger again. Things will break down — the electrical grid, the water systems, medical supplies shortages, food shortages.

The Corn Syrup Cornucopia was necessary for Boasian human egalitarianism to exist at all. When the shortages and privations come, egalitarianism goes straight out the window, and human eugenics will be brought back with a passion.

The Eugenic Aristocracy of the Competent will be white people who have adopted Confucian values in order to bring back our mathematical/engineering traditions.

The Chinese physicist in Cambridge Massachusetts is the living embodiment of what we need to adopt in ourselves in order to win back the world.

We had that once, before egalitarianism was a thing. The public schools tested and tracked kids even back in the 1800’s. A percentage of the (white) kids, mostly boys, were taught the full Newtonian calculus and a good amount of basic physics with an emphasis on mechanical and civil engineering. Only a tiny percentage of college graduates today, get to the level in mathematics and engineering of high school boys like Henry Ford.

But Henry Ford isn’t with us. What we have is the Chinese physicist, the calm Confucian, who has adapted to the modern world and managed to stay on top.

If we adopted the essence of that Chinese physicist, our troubles here would be over very quickly. We lost the world because the life of the mind was taken away from us, and we were made into sleeping TV babies.

by Carolyne Merick

The times in which we are living are more polarizing than ever in recent memory. Thus, people are separated by extremes, reactivity, and heated emotion. But, at the same time, a Great Awakening is under way, and it is important to highlight some important points, re-calibrate, and focus our directive moving forward.

It behooves us to veer a little into the political sphere that I typically avoid in my writing because many people are either unaware or completely misinformed by the exploding shift that has occurred over the past couple of years, and many just can't make heads nor tails of it.
My assessment is that the formerly dominant political agenda had been pushed with ever increasing frequency, intensity, and hostility until which point that it over-saturated society to the degree that many people, myself and many of you reading this, became exceedingly frustrated. Meanwhile, rhetoric coming out of the mouths of people promoting mainstream views were becoming increasingly hateful toward ethnic-Europeans and disparaging about Western culture.

Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) said protestors forcing U.S. Senators to leave restaurants, like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) was justified “because when you look at white supremacists and all that.”

Partial transcript as follows:

BASH: The president, Republicans are saying Democratic protesters are, quote, ‘an angry mob.’ What I want to ask you about, it is one thing to protest the Supreme Court at the Capitol. That’s been done for generations and frankly since the founding of this country.

HIRONO: Yes.

BASH: It’s another thing to run senators out of restaurants and go to their homes. Is that going too far?

HIRONO: I think it just means that there are a lot of people who are very, very much motivated about what is going on. Because hat happened with Judge Kavanaugh from the very beginning, this is not a fair process. What the Republicans did was to telegraph after Dr. Ford’s account came forward, what they telegraph was, one, Dr. Ford, we don’t want to hear from you. Two, if we have to hear from you, we will rig the hearing —

by Mind Weapon

Everything is so horrible that there will absolutely be a major backlash. It is up to us to make this backlash as hard and fast and soon as possible.

When you are a people held captive and your lands are flooded with foreigners, you got to do better than kvetch about the good old days and wish the elites felt bad for us and would make the bad people go away.

There is this idea that if we can get enough TV babies and whiggers and whigresses to feel bad about the current situation, we can turn it around and save ourselves. But TV babies and whiggers can’t accomplish anything at all.

As long as Southeast Asians can buy up and operate the convenience stores and hotels without any competition from the natives, and take up most of the spots in STEM majors and grad school positions in the universities, we aren’t even beginning to resist.

You can learn from your enemy. Bill Kristol is a bad man who despises people that I hold dear. But I am not seeing that we are proving him wrong — granted that there is a lot of malign encouragement and incentives to have broken up families and TV babies. (see Bill Kristol advocate replacing the white working class with immigrants here.)

It’s absolutely true that we are victims of divorce culture, and feminism, and bad public schools, junk food, the end of jobs for teenagers, overpriced but crap college education, and even the medicating of schoolboys for whom Ritalin is training wheels for Percosets, then heroin, then fentanyl, then embalming fluid! People are literally dropping like flies out here from fentanyl. It is a literal kill off, and no one seems to know what to do about it.

The old white nationalist 1.0 movement back in the 1990’s and 2000’s had a term “conditioning for death.” It was in reference to race mixing propaganda on TV and movies.

In retrospect, we were even more right than we realized. Children are literally groomed for doom in a whole raft of ways. TV as a babysitter, junk food, vidya games, public school hell with peers who live in utter squalor and bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator, “equality” and “self esteem” as the ruling ideology of the public schools.

This will all go away if it’s defunded, of course. The “groomed for doom” system that preys upon our babies is funded by deficit spending. Let’s hope this child eating Monster runs out of gas, and soon!

But at the same time, it is a voluntary Monster. Parents deliver their children to Moloch when they put them in front of the TV and send them to public schools and create an Idiocratic home environment.

by John Young

Imagine a family in which the husband is an engineer and the wife is a lawyer, earning a combined $180k/year. They live in a housing development in a nice suburb, in a home with a mortgage costing $3,500/month. They both drive late model cars, with each car requiring $525/month in car payments. Somehow, in their busy lives, they managed to conceive a child who is put in daycare for $300/week. Because they are very busy, they grab something at McDonald’s on their way into work, eat lunch out and most evenings they grab some form of take-out for dinner. They take their work clothes to the dry-cleaner, and every couple of weeks they have a cleaning service take care of vacuuming the house and tidying up. Being very busy, they barely know their neighbors, but that’s okay because their neighbors are busy too. Attempts to set up a neighborhood barbecue once each summer have some basic success, but conversation is strained and people can’t remember each other’s names.

This is the general family model put forward in the propasphere. You see it implied in advertising, present in daytime TV, and presented as an ideal for which people should strive. It conforms to a world where everything takes place solely in the market economy. Listening to the news or watching TV, you’d get the impression that the market economy is the only one that exists.

And this is understandable. Cable TV itself collects over $100 billion annually just to keep people entertained and misinformed. Likewise, advertisers and programmers are all selling something in the market economy. Hence, their motivations are consistent with what they present. Obviously, banks and governments are quite fond of market economies because everything can be sorted, taxed, tallied and measured. As far as banking and government are concerned, if it doesn’t happen in the market economy, it doesn’t exist. I’ll come back to that point shortly.

Of course, the imagery and presentation of advertising ideals is only germane to the very small portion of our people who can afford to live like that. Only 16% of our people have the IQ to be lawyers, registered nurses and the like. And only 1.7% of our people have the IQ to be engineers, doctors or scientists. Only 5% of Americans have combined household incomes exceeding $150k.

Those of us who aren’t too entranced by our boob tubes realize that what happens outside of the market economy is called life. A lot of people realize that a life dominated by market economics, where everything is a number or a status symbol, or where one’s value is determined solely by their paycheck, can be the road to a doomed meaningless existence. For this reason, not everyone with the requisite IQ to pursue higher income careers falls down that hole – there are a number of very very bright subsistence farmers out there. An important aspect of adding “diversity” to the mix is that among European-Americans, even high intelligence and motivation are insufficient, so a large number of highly capable European-Americans are under-employed. Of course, the more one’s life depends upon the market, the more their security and well-being are tied to forces completely outside of their control.

This means that taken in practice, about 95% of our people supply at least a portion of their needs outside the market economy. These needs are provided by two economies seldom mentioned in the propasphere: the community economy, and the home economy.

Following Thursday’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with Judge Kavanaugh and his accuser, leftists on Twitter began discussing the need for a “violent general strike” if he were to be confirmed. This comes just days after a violent antifa group confronted Senator Ted Cruz and his family at a restaurant and then made credible threats against the lives of Senator Cruz, Judge Kavanaugh, President Trump, and others from their Twitter and Facebook accounts.

The original Twitter thread (archived here) came from Data Scientist and left-wing activist, Emily Gorcenski.

by John Young

If I'm not around, it usually means I'm busy doing something useful. In this case, I've been researching and gathering materials for a manual to help our Suicide Prevention Strike Force SPSF). That manual is now complete, and without even needing to log in, just use your TOR browser to go to our member's site. Scroll down, the link is near the bottom.

A few months ago, we gathered the members we needed, and a leader for that group. But despite good intentions, they wanted some guidance -- and so now we have the manual.

The general purpose of the SPSF is to contact pro-European-American activists who have been doxxed, offer contact with kindred spirits to avoid isolation, perhaps provide suggestions for help with more pressing needs and evaluate whether the activists need emergency intervention. And if it is an emergency, bring in kin or professionals.

But how will you know if it is an emergency? That is part of what this manual tells you. It also explains the new paradigms for suicide, what happens in the brains of suicidal people, and the most common mistakes people make when dealing with those who have become suicidal. The manual also discusses risk factors for suicide, some of which are surprising.

Because of the nature and purpose of the manual, rather than bind it and sell it, I've decided to make it a free PDF and release it under the Creative Commons Attribution license. ALL pro-European-American activists are persecuted when discovered, and all are at risk. There are numerous groups, and I didn't want the manual limited to just ours.

So follow the link if you are curious! Meanwhile, in the next couple of weeks this project will be up and running!

by Heather McDonald

In 1903, during America’s darkest period of hate, W. E. B. Du Bois heartbreakingly affirmed his intellectual affinity with Western civilization.

“I sit with Shakespeare and he winces not. Across the color line I move arm in arm with Balzac and Dumas,” Du Bois wrote in “The Souls of Black Folk.” “I summon Aristotle and Aurelius and what soul I will, and they come all graciously with no scorn nor condescension.”

Half a century earlier, Frederick Douglass had paid tribute to the 18th-century British orators whom, at age 12, he had discovered in a collection of political speeches.

“Every opportunity afforded me, for a time, was spent in diligently perusing [“The Columbian Orator”],” Douglass recalled in his autobiography. “This volume was, indeed, a rich treasure,” he wrote, for the speeches—by Richard Sheridan, Charles James Fox, and William Pitt—“gave tongue to many interesting thoughts, which had frequently flashed through my soul, and died away for want of utterance.”

How much things have changed.

Incidents of violence and threats against the political right have escalated as the establishment media amp up its hate rhetoric against President Trump and his supporters.

The morning after Meet the Press moderator Chuck Todd compared media critics to racist segregationists and singled out Fox News as one of America’s biggest problems, a man in a “mentally agitated state,” and apparently upset over an officer involved shooting, intentionally crashed his vehicle into the studios of FOX 4 in Dallas, Texas.

Besides Todd, many in the media, especially at far-left CNN have “othered” Fox News and presented the network as a unique danger to America.

CNN’s Brian Stelter has gone so far as to spread conspiracy theories about Fox News controlling President Trump.

Hours after the far-left Washington Post published Joe Scarborough’s September 11 op-ed claiming Trump is a bigger danger to America than the 9/11 terrorists, a mass shooting threat was made against a group of Trump supporters meeting at the president’s hotel in Washington DC.

The Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, said Wednesday that "Europe belongs to the Europeans" and that refugees should return to their native countries to rebuild them.

Video

Speaking at a conference in Sweden's third-largest city of Malmo, home to a large immigrant population, the Dalai Lama -- who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1989 -- said Europe was "morally responsible" for helping "a refugee really facing danger against their life".

"Receive them, help them, educate them... but ultimately they should develop their own country," said the 83-year-old Tibetan who fled the capital Lhasa in fear of his life after China poured troops into the region to crush an uprising.

by Micheal J. Polignano

Today in the United States and most of the White world, as soon as a White child is old enough to understand language, he is told that he should feel guilt for the crimes of his ancestors. Guilt for finding, conquering, enslaving, and killing off non-Whites around the globe ... and littering in the process. Guilt, not for his own crimes, but for the crimes of other people of the same race.

But he is also told that he should feel no pride in the amazing achievements of his race. No pride in the pyramids and the Parthenon, no pride in the arch and the dome, no pride in White science and technology and medicine, no pride in the glories of European painting and sculpture and music, no pride in Plato and Shakespeare and Dostoevsky, no pride in the exploration of the globe and the conquest of space. Pride, not in his own achievements, but in the achievements of other people of the same race.

But if it is reasonable to feel White guilt, then it is reasonable to feel White pride.

This is a subversive thought, for if one does a balance sheet comparing reasons for White guilt and White pride, Whites might discover that they have far more to be proud of than guilty of. They might then decide to resist their dispossession.

“Re ‘Bernier’s self-centred move will give the Libs another mandate’ (Lorne Gunter, Aug. 23): Mr. Gunter, and a great many others, are so concerned about stopping Trudeau that the main point, which many may not yet consciously realize, is being lost. Since massive Third World immigration was foisted on us some 50 years ago, all four political parties have been in politically correct lock-step regarding multiculturalism. “Hate crime” laws and “human rights” commissions have been created to deter any resistance, so not only are we voiceless, we are also penalized and censored if we try to express our feelings.

Maxime Bernier is setting up a political party which will speak for us on these issues, and believe me, the support he is going to receive will be absolutely massive. Politics itself is no longer the issue, as people are now thoroughly sick and tired of politicians who will sell out the “traditional” Canadians who built this country in exchange for imported voting blocs to keep themselves in power. Scheer and Trudeau differ only in the speed at which they will take us to our destruction, and this stupid “Liberals versus Conservatives” charade has to end before it destroys us. Prepare to be amazed.” (Toronto Sun, Aug. 28th).