The Hungarian government has announced a new plan to financially incentive Hungarian women to have more children as an answer to mass Third World immigration—with part of the plan being a move to grant total and lifelong exemption from personal income tax for any woman having four children.

The pro-family policies were announced by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán on Sunday February 10 at a packed auditorium at Budapest’s famous Castle Garden Bazaar center during his annual state of the nation address.

Orbán told the crowd that the seven-point “family protection action plan” was “Hungary’s answer to immigration” and consisted of the following:

1. Every woman under the age of 40 will be eligible to a preferential loan when they first get married;

2. The already existing preferential loan for the purchase of a family home will be extended for any couple having two or more children (previously the figure was three or more);

3. The government will repay one million forints of any mortgage loan taken out by families with two or more children;

Trotsky’s theory of permanent revolution was realised by the Frankfurt School via means of a technique called “critical theory”. According to Max Horkheimer, it was the social theory of criticising all aspects of Western society, with the ultimate purpose of eradicating it. Horkheimer’s theory led to extremely destructive criticism of the West, particularly in the fields of religion, homogeneity, norms, family, morality, tradition, culture, sexual morals, loyalty, patriotism, masculinity, nationalism and conservatism.

When the National Socialists came to power in Germany in 1933, the Frankfurt School fled to the USA, but most of its members returned after 1945. Herbert Marcuse remained in America after the war, where he demonstrated an uncanny ability to popularise Cultural Marxism, and thus had an enormous impact on future generations. His Eros and Civilisation continued the synthesis of Marx and Freud and advocated for “liberating Eros” to create what he called “polymorphous perversity”. This was a continuation of Georg Lukács’ theories on using sexuality to destroy Western civilisation. Eros and Civilisation became extremely popular among the hippy movement in the 1960s.

by Kenaz Filan

As Donald Trump completes his second year in office, we have learned a bit more about who he is. We have learned that his sense of shame is as lacking as his Brain-To-Tweet filter and his staffing skills. We have discovered his rare gift for making his enemies shoot themselves in the foot after he reduces them to a catchphrase like "Lyin’ Ted" or "Little Rocket Man." And we have been entertained by a Presidency that appears to lie somewhere between a WWE production and a reality TV series. But when we look beyond the endless entertainment cycle that is the Trump White House and the coverage thereof, we have also discovered a few things that Donald Trump is not.

Donald Trump is not a dictator. The #Resistance says otherwise but they’ve been telling us that for a while. So far Robert Reich has not been gunned down. Rachel Maddow has not been arrested for sedition. Stephen Colbert, John Oliver, Trevor Noah, Samantha Bee and Jimmy Kimmel have not been no-platformed. Trump may say mean things about his critics on Twitter, but he has to date refrained from throwing them out of helicopters. Indeed, Trump’s supporters have faced more threats of violence than his critics.

While the nation loses its collective mind over a fake hate crime allegedly committed by white MAGA hat wearing hillbillies in Chicago, Illinois (on a night when it was 20 degrees below zero), and white Democrats in Virginia having worn blackface more than 30 years ago, five black juveniles - the youngest being 12 - have been arrested for the murder of a white male in Nashville.

While our corporate media declares war on Liam Neeson for admitting he once contemplated killing a "black bastard" because one of his friends was raped by a black male, yet another white individual has been murdered by blacks in America.

This time, it was five black juveniles - the youngest being 12 - who participated in the murder of a white male.

His name is Kyle Yorlets.

This is the same politically correct agenda that is commonplace on college campuses, where race and sex pandering have led to the rise of bloated 'diversity bureaucracies.'

by Scott Bledsoe

As the Democrats take control of the House in the new year, reports are emerging that corporate quotas will be a high priority for House Financial Services Committee Chair Maxine Waters and her colleagues. They want to increase the number of women and minorities in America’s top boardrooms, set up subcommittees on corporate diversity and inclusion, and introduce legislation to force public disclosure of the sex and racial makeup of company boards.

This is the same politically correct agenda that is commonplace on college campuses, where race and sex pandering have led to the rise of bloated “diversity bureaucracies.” These aggressive organizations are ever-expanding in their reach and oversight into the lives of students and faculty. A 2018 report from The Economist highlighted a nationwide trend toward increased spending on useless administrative positions, which provide student services focused on racial and sexual politics.

by John Young

In seeing the recent travesty of justice that is the James Fields verdict, and reading about Fourth Generation Warfare, the importance of taking and holding the moral high ground comes into stark relief.

When I speak of the moral high ground, I am not referring to claiming some sort of empty moral victory by adherence to an abstract principle, while simultaneously suffering successive real-world defeats. (Though the right IS quite good at that.) Nor am I referring to adhering to a specific set of religious values, especially to the point of becoming soon-to-be-forgotten martyrs. Rather, I am referring to being seen by the general populace, or at least the portion of it we seek to help, as being “the good guys,” and therefore deserving of aid and comfort.

Being seen as “the good guys” certainly implies moral values, but it also implies being seen, meaning that it is more a matter of perception than reality. People react to what they believe to be true rather than what is actually true. Though, when the two are synchronized, their best interests are served. We are, after all, already the good guys in terms of our moral position. It is not WE who are executing a genocide. It is not WE who are railroading innocent people into jails to serve a political agenda. It is not WE who engineer a trail of endless lies and machinations to enslave millions to an agenda that serves a handful of people. It is we who stand for freedom and justice. We are already the good guys.

But like I said, belief counts more than reality in terms of behavior. And if people believe we are the bad guys? Reality doesn’t matter in terms of the outcome, save that people acting on the basis of faulty belief always act against themselves in the long-run. But that is small comfort to those harmed in the short term. Our goal is to bring belief into coherence with reality among those we seek to help. And if their beliefs conform to reality, then their actions will follow.

It is difficult to seize the moral high ground when unethical enemies hold Non-Governmental Organizations, substantial influence within law enforcement, all major media organs , corrupted religious institutions and an unlimited source of funding. Under such conditions, your enemies define us in whatever terms they choose, no matter what the facts might be. It is a fact of reality that what people believe has more of an effect on their actions than what is true. And if we are portrayed as sufficiently evil, most people will never even give us a chance to straighten out the record.
And this is no mistake. Holding the moral high ground in the eyes of our constituency is a critical aspect of success in any type of war, but especially in a cultural war when simply nuking the enemy is not an option. Our enemies know this, and as a result they make every conceivable effort to make sure this critical piece of territory is denied to us.

In recent times, corporate actors ranging from social media companies to credit card processors have engaged in what is really an unprecedented level of un-personing – denying service to people on the basis of what they believe, or what they are merely purported to believe, or what they say, or with whom they associate. Because these are large companies who could not withstand substantial public backlash, the only reason they can do such things is because those they have un-personed have been sufficiently smeared in advance that the average person on the street sees the targets of these actions as subhumans who don’t deserve to live, and who are therefore unworthy of any defense.

On December 9 at about 4AM, a student at Columbia University filmed another student committing the unpardonable sin of declaring that he loves being white. The video lasts less than a minute as a clearly intoxicated and upset scrawny white boy flails about while screaming:

Europeans built the modern world. We built the modern world. We invented science and industry, and you want to tell us to stop because oh my God, we’re so bad….We saved billions of people from starvation….White people are the best thing that ever happened to the world. We are so amazing. I love myself and I love white people. Fuck yeah, white people. Fuck yeah, white men. We’re white men, we did everything. I don’t hate other people, I just love white men, I love white men.

For the last two days, a terrifying and gruesome video has gone viral on the internet. The short clip was recorded by two of the Islamists guilty of raping and murdering two Scandinavian tourists in their twenties.

I was browsing 4chan when a thread caught my attention, the discussion was about the recent murder of two Scandinavian girls in the Moroccan Atlas mountains. There I found the link containing the infamous video, which I decided to watch from start to finish.

Many people won’t be able to watch it and I do not blame them, it was tough to watch it until the end and it left me trembling with anger, but it’s deeply important to see certain terrible facts with our own eyes.
Here is a description of what happens in the video:

by Urs Gehriger

"Excuse me", Tucker Carlson apologizes as his assistant, Emily, ushers me into his airy Fox News office in the Washington DC bureau. The phone on his desk is ringing.

"This probably should be quick", Carlson promises as he picks up.

Every minute is tightly planned in Tucker Carlson's studio. He is the break out cable news star of the year in US media. 2.7 million Americans turn on Fox News every night to watch the preppy tribune of the forgotten man. Carlson's new book, "Ship of Fools", has vaulted to number one on the New York Times best-seller list unseating Bob Woodward's "Fear" after four weeks in the top spot.

Carlson spins fast laps in the office, phone to his ear. “Hey. No, it's totally fine. I told the guy to fuck off.” From his mouth spills a torrent of profanities. His facial expressions change like clouds in a storm gust. "What? No. Stop!”, he shouts. “I'm not a whiny victim.”

Carlson’s past month off air has been turbulent. Anti-fascist goons besieged his Washington DC home. His wife Susie was alone inside when the mob pounded on the front door and shouted, "Tucker, we know where you sleep at night!" Terrified, Susie barricaded herself in the pantry and called the police for help.

It cannot be stressed enough that this agreement is not about refugees fleeing persecution, or their rights to protection under international law. Instead, the agreement propagates the radical idea that migration -- for any reason -- is something that needs to be promoted, enabled and protected.

The UN has no interest in admitting that its agreement promotes migration as a human right; until recently, there has been little debate about it. More debate might risk jeopardizing the entire project.

UN member states are not only supposed to open their borders for the migrants of the world, but should also help them pick and choose their future country by providing them with comprehensive information about each country they may wish to settle in.

For nearly 40 years, Jim Riley and his family have lived on their 760-acre apple farm in Oak Glen, California, in San Bernardino County.

Jim and his wife built a Colonial-inspired home on the farm in 1994, and were thinking about doing 18th century dinner theater. Shortly thereafter, the Rileys were approached by parents of local elementary school students asking for historical field trips at the farm. “We started doing American Revolution-themed tours, and Civil War reenactments for 5th graders in Southern California,” Riley said when we talked recently. “Within five years, we were seeing 50,000 students a year, and in the last 17 years, more than 1.2 million students, parents and teachers visited programs on the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, and the California Gold Rush.”

Riley described the events as an escape to the 18th century, where school children are met and harassed by Redcoats as they arrive at the farm. “It’s all American for people who love America,” Riley said.

However, schools recently began cancelling reservations for the Riley Farm historical reenactments.

Since the Left uses racism as the battering ram to enforce an egalitarian agenda to redistribute resources from Whites to other "people of color," hate is a topical subject that has not received enough attention in terms of empirical data. For example, research on altruism and sexual selection—to name just two—can fill volumes. But hate, has not been studied as intensely as the other areas of human emotions, so when I saw the book The Psychology of Hate, edited by Robert J. Sternberg, 2004, it was a must read.

First, any study of hate is inclusive of disgust, fear, and anger and should include the broad categories of ethnocentrism and its other side—xenophobia. As such, studying hate cannot be undertaken without also including the genetic component that has evolved and why and in what ways humans hate as a means of improving individual and especially group fitness within the study of group evolutionary strategies.

Unfortunately, this book failed miserably as an empirical attempt to understand hate, and instead leaned heavily towards simplistic formulations to try and eliminate hate by merely describing it, and implicating Whites most often in its cause and effect on others. I really didn't expect anything else, but occasionally surprises do happen. I know Robert J. Sternberg's work, and he comes from the Marxist wing of the deniers of racial differences. With Sternberg as editor, I suspected this book would be biased, and I was correct. So the best I can do, rather than shed any more light on the evolutionary basis of hate, anger, fear and disgust, is to shed some light on how even today's psychology is very close to the Standard Social Science Model (SSSM), and therefore unable to produce good research.

Recently, I arrived at a moment of introspection about a curious aspect of my own behavior. When I disagree with a conservative friend or colleague on some political issue, I have no fear of speaking my mind. I talk, they listen, they respond, I talk some more, and at the end of it we get along just as we always have. But I’ve discovered that when a progressive friend says something with which I disagree or that I know to be incorrect, I’m hesitant to point it out. This hesitancy is a consequence of the different treatment one tends to receive from those on the Right and Left when expressing a difference of opinion. I am not, as it turns out, the only one who has noticed this.

Melissa Chen @MsMelChen

I'm a centrist: I hold some conservative views and some liberal views.

But I'm more afraid of talking to my liberal friends about my conservative views than I am talking to my conservative friends about my liberal views.
17.2K
4:46 PM - Jan 16, 2018

“That’s a stupid fucking question,” answered a Socialist Alliance activist when I asked sincerely where they were getting what sounded like inflated poverty statistics. “If you don’t believe in gay marriage or gun control, unfriend me,” demand multiple Facebook statuses from those I know. “That’s gross and racist!” spluttered a red-faced Ben Affleck when the atheist and neuroscientist Sam Harris criticized Islamic doctrines on Bill Maher’s Real Time. Nobody blinks an eye when Harris criticizes Christianity, least of all Affleck, who starred in Kevin Smith’s irreverent religious satire Dogma. But Christians are not held to be a sacrosanct and protected minority on the political Left. As Skeptic Magazine’s Michael Shermer tweeted recently:

All white advocates should salute The New York Times. Week after week, one author after another openly declares his intention to replace us with non-white immigrants. It’s nice to know where we stand, and to know we were right all along. A few weeks ago, it was Charles Blow. Today, it was Michelle Goldberg, in an op-ed with the blunt title, “We Can Replace Them.”

Miss Goldberg refers in her column to the recent violent attack on a Pittsburgh synagogue by a man who believed Donald Trump was too friendly to Jews and who did not vote for him. She also refers to the bomb threats made by a scarcely-white Trump supporter, a career criminal who claimed to be a Seminole Indian and is the son of a Filipino immigrant. Somehow, for her, they symbolize white people who vote for Donald Trump.

“Right now America is tearing itself apart as an embittered white conservative minority clings to power, terrified at being swamped by a new multicultural polyglot majority,” she writes. “The divide feels especially stark in Georgia, where the midterm election is a battle between Trumpist reaction [white Republican Brian Kemp] and the multicultural America [black Democrat Stacey Abrams] whose emergence the right is trying, at all costs, to forestall.”

by Mark Point

It’s obvious that in a post-Obama America the anti-white zeitgeist is out of pandora’s box. Whether it was always lurking beneath the language of multiculturalism and diversity is for historians to figure out. What’s obvious is that when mainstream media personalities like Don Lemon or New York Times employees like Sarah Jeong freely spew textbook anti-white racism the world takes notice, the Overton window shifts and the temperature rises in the frog-pot. Over in Canada, in Europe and Australia whites are under attack. Due to unprecedented immigration and fatalist progressive experiments, there is no country where anti-white cultural currents are not rising. It wasn’t supposed to be this way, weakness, wealth transfers, preferential treatment, open borders and accommodation were supposed to invite warm feelings, equal outcomes and racial blindness.

It’s not the older conservatives but younger ones and future generations who are facing an unpleasant and unprecedented future if this trajectory continues. Not without reason are Millennials questioning the byzantine social codes and power dynamics they inherited from Boomers. Unlike Cold Warrior conservatives who were raised in communities with high social trust whose unifying threat was Eastern communism, Millennials were the first guinea pigs in the “racial blindness” experiment their elders enlisted them into.

Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) isn’t going to lose on Tuesday, but that’s not why this comment from Donald Trump Jr., the president’s oldest son and of his most popular surrogates, is so important:

Donald Trump Jr.
✔
@DonaldJTrumpJr

Angus King is a Fake Independent who votes with Schumer 88% of the time. Angus wants to repopulate Maine with Syrian and Somalian refugees. Support @SenatorBrakey who fights for secure borders and Better Jobs for Maine. #me #maine
12:43 PM - Nov 3, 2018

Often when conservative politicians talk about their opposition to large groups of non-white immigrants, they couch it in the rhetoric of “bad apples.” Saying you’re worried about MS-13, for instance, is a more socially acceptable argument than simply saying you don’t like Central Americans—people who should know better might even defend you when you do it. In this tweet, Trump isn’t offering misplaced fears about, I don’t know, Al-Shabaab or something. He’s not couching it in anything, there are no dots to connect; he just doesn’t want Somalis, full-stop. Having Somalis in your community is bad, on its surface, simply because they’re Somalis—that’s it, that’s the argument.

The sense that the nation’s culture and way of life have dramatically changed is reflected in a PRRI “American Values” survey that gauged both political opinions and “cultural alienation.”

It found that 47 percent of Americans now say that things have changed so much, they “feel like a stranger in their own country.” A slim majority (51 percent) disagree.

Nearly six in 10 Republicans say that things have changed so much they feel alienated; 42 percent of Democrats agree.

Was there a better era to live in? Americans are divided on whether the country’s culture and way of life has changed for the better or worse since the 1950s. Fifty percent say such change is for the better, while 47 percent say culture has gotten worse according to the survey survey.

by John Young




The Apostles of Epic Evil are unabashedly inconsistent with their own stated principles. Instead, straight out of Rules for Radicals, they attempt to turn our own principles against us as a form of suicide pact. Little by little, we on the Right have understood that you cannot give your enemy the benefit of principles to which your enemy does not himself adhere. And as we have stopped treating our enemies as merely misinformed “friends,” we have finally started to make inroads in culture and politics for the first time in decades.

Of course, the Leftist-Globalist Axis of Evil does not have principles as such. Instead, they have ambitions. Anything that advances their ambition is undertaken, no matter what principles must be overthrown.

The Left was long a champion for the First Amendment, especially when it pertained to flooding local convenience stores or the Internet with pornography, making sure open communists could attain tenure in colleges, or they could use it to remove Christian symbols from graves or town property. But now that they are in a position where the First Amendment is being used to challenge their hegemony, they are looking for every possible excuse to set the Bill of Right on fire, and burn it into nonexistence.

Though the principles of the Axis of Evil do not really exist and hence appear inconsistent without regard to their words, their goals are clear and never waver. Anything that can possibly be used to advance the cause of white genocide or the destruction of our traditional freedoms is seized upon and played to the utmost.

Gab is a small competitor of Twitter whose distinctive selling point is free speech. By way of contrast, Facebook and Twitter have employed tens of thousands of people in what they call an “election war room” dedicated to bringing about Leftist and Globalist results in the upcoming election by systematically limiting and de-platforming anyone opposed to their agenda. Gab has no such efforts in place, allowing free-wheeling discussion that includes all aspects of the spectrum ranging from Jewish feminists and Neocons all the way to neo-Monarchists and the nationalist right.

Twitter and Facebook actively colluded to try to deny Bolsonaro the election in Brazil, whereas Gab gave all candidates and their supporters free rein.

Of course, Gab is dramatically different from these other platforms in other ways as well. WHO pays for Twitter and Facebook? Advertisers. WHO pays for Gab? Its users. This is fundamental because with Facebook and Twitter, you get the service for free because YOU (and all your personal info) are the PRODUCT whose attention and information is provided to the people who pay them. (Including shadowy government agencies.) In contrast, with Gab, you are the CUSTOMER. Gab just recently raised over $1M from its regular users to pay for its expansion. Though powered by a dedicated personality in the personage of Andrew Torba, what makes Gab possible is that its users appreciate free speech strongly enough to support it with their wallets.

Free speech is a problem for our enemies, because for decades they controlled virtually all press and could control outcomes of elections by controlling the information available that people could use to make decisions. With the Internet, that control started to break down. Though there has long been an effort, spearheaded by the Anti-Defamation League, to remove websites or alter search algorithms, the enemies of freedom went into full-blown panic with the election of Trump in 2016. Though Trump is certainly not “our guy,” he is opposed to the Leftist-Globalist plantation, so his election sent shock waves throughout the Leftist-Globalist Axis of Evil and the Deep State. They discovered that free speech online is not merely a fringe threat, but poses a very real threat to their hegemony.

With the number of hate crimes and xenophobic parties growing across the continent, members of the European Parliament passed a resolution in Strasbourg that condemned the lack of serious action against extremist groups, including neo-Nazis.

The text, which was endorsed by 355 parliamentarians, specifically pointed to incidents such as the attack by right-wing terrorist Anders Brevik that killed 77 people, 48 of whom were under 18, in Norway in 2011, the murder of UK MP Jo Cox by a supporter of Brexit in 2016, and a recent attack by neo-Fascist gangs in Italy against European Parliamentarian Eleonora Forenza.

The text also warned of the rise of right-wing extremist groups like the German National Socialist Underground, as well as Golden Dawn’s growing presence in Greece, and the spike in the number of hate crime-related shootings and murders that have targeted immigrants in Italy.

by Mind Weapon



In 2040, there will still be human hierarchy.

What sort of man will be the elite?

What new and unforeseen forces will have shaped society between now and 2040?

Being energy literate, it is still a safe bet that the Corn Syrup Cornucopia is going to fail, and humanity will feel widespread hunger again. Things will break down — the electrical grid, the water systems, medical supplies shortages, food shortages.

The Corn Syrup Cornucopia was necessary for Boasian human egalitarianism to exist at all. When the shortages and privations come, egalitarianism goes straight out the window, and human eugenics will be brought back with a passion.

The Eugenic Aristocracy of the Competent will be white people who have adopted Confucian values in order to bring back our mathematical/engineering traditions.

The Chinese physicist in Cambridge Massachusetts is the living embodiment of what we need to adopt in ourselves in order to win back the world.

We had that once, before egalitarianism was a thing. The public schools tested and tracked kids even back in the 1800’s. A percentage of the (white) kids, mostly boys, were taught the full Newtonian calculus and a good amount of basic physics with an emphasis on mechanical and civil engineering. Only a tiny percentage of college graduates today, get to the level in mathematics and engineering of high school boys like Henry Ford.

But Henry Ford isn’t with us. What we have is the Chinese physicist, the calm Confucian, who has adapted to the modern world and managed to stay on top.

If we adopted the essence of that Chinese physicist, our troubles here would be over very quickly. We lost the world because the life of the mind was taken away from us, and we were made into sleeping TV babies.

by Carolyne Merick

The times in which we are living are more polarizing than ever in recent memory. Thus, people are separated by extremes, reactivity, and heated emotion. But, at the same time, a Great Awakening is under way, and it is important to highlight some important points, re-calibrate, and focus our directive moving forward.

It behooves us to veer a little into the political sphere that I typically avoid in my writing because many people are either unaware or completely misinformed by the exploding shift that has occurred over the past couple of years, and many just can't make heads nor tails of it.
My assessment is that the formerly dominant political agenda had been pushed with ever increasing frequency, intensity, and hostility until which point that it over-saturated society to the degree that many people, myself and many of you reading this, became exceedingly frustrated. Meanwhile, rhetoric coming out of the mouths of people promoting mainstream views were becoming increasingly hateful toward ethnic-Europeans and disparaging about Western culture.

Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) said protestors forcing U.S. Senators to leave restaurants, like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) was justified “because when you look at white supremacists and all that.”

Partial transcript as follows:

BASH: The president, Republicans are saying Democratic protesters are, quote, ‘an angry mob.’ What I want to ask you about, it is one thing to protest the Supreme Court at the Capitol. That’s been done for generations and frankly since the founding of this country.

HIRONO: Yes.

BASH: It’s another thing to run senators out of restaurants and go to their homes. Is that going too far?

HIRONO: I think it just means that there are a lot of people who are very, very much motivated about what is going on. Because hat happened with Judge Kavanaugh from the very beginning, this is not a fair process. What the Republicans did was to telegraph after Dr. Ford’s account came forward, what they telegraph was, one, Dr. Ford, we don’t want to hear from you. Two, if we have to hear from you, we will rig the hearing —

by Mind Weapon

Everything is so horrible that there will absolutely be a major backlash. It is up to us to make this backlash as hard and fast and soon as possible.

When you are a people held captive and your lands are flooded with foreigners, you got to do better than kvetch about the good old days and wish the elites felt bad for us and would make the bad people go away.

There is this idea that if we can get enough TV babies and whiggers and whigresses to feel bad about the current situation, we can turn it around and save ourselves. But TV babies and whiggers can’t accomplish anything at all.

As long as Southeast Asians can buy up and operate the convenience stores and hotels without any competition from the natives, and take up most of the spots in STEM majors and grad school positions in the universities, we aren’t even beginning to resist.

You can learn from your enemy. Bill Kristol is a bad man who despises people that I hold dear. But I am not seeing that we are proving him wrong — granted that there is a lot of malign encouragement and incentives to have broken up families and TV babies. (see Bill Kristol advocate replacing the white working class with immigrants here.)

It’s absolutely true that we are victims of divorce culture, and feminism, and bad public schools, junk food, the end of jobs for teenagers, overpriced but crap college education, and even the medicating of schoolboys for whom Ritalin is training wheels for Percosets, then heroin, then fentanyl, then embalming fluid! People are literally dropping like flies out here from fentanyl. It is a literal kill off, and no one seems to know what to do about it.

The old white nationalist 1.0 movement back in the 1990’s and 2000’s had a term “conditioning for death.” It was in reference to race mixing propaganda on TV and movies.

In retrospect, we were even more right than we realized. Children are literally groomed for doom in a whole raft of ways. TV as a babysitter, junk food, vidya games, public school hell with peers who live in utter squalor and bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator, “equality” and “self esteem” as the ruling ideology of the public schools.

This will all go away if it’s defunded, of course. The “groomed for doom” system that preys upon our babies is funded by deficit spending. Let’s hope this child eating Monster runs out of gas, and soon!

But at the same time, it is a voluntary Monster. Parents deliver their children to Moloch when they put them in front of the TV and send them to public schools and create an Idiocratic home environment.